Cited by 0Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection

Research on sensor dirt recognition of autonomous vehicle camera based on deep learning

Wu, Zhijun, Wang, Yuchang, Ran, Lujia, Hu, Zongjie, Liu, Zhuolin, Ding, Xiangrui, Chen, Zhengzhe, Shi, Yuxin +1 more·2024·Second International Conference on Informatics, Networking, and Computing (ICINC 2023)

Abstract

Intelligent driving technology is an important direction of the current development of automobile technology. The realization of intelligent technology is based on the perception ability of car sensors such as cameras and lidar for the driving environment detection. In the actual driving, the surface pollution of sensors will reduce the safety of intelligent driving vehicles. Therefore, it is very important to realize the automatic recognition of ultra-near-field dirt on the optical surface of car sensors. At present, the research on camera sensor fouling recognition is very scarce, and the relevant public data set for recognition research is also lacking. This paper conducted an in-depth study on the contamination problem of the camera sensor of the autonomous vehicle, independently created a dataset of dirt on the camera sensor, and trained the dataset based on the YOLO-V5 model using this dataset. The results show that the dataset we constructed is quite reasonable, with obvious features and excellent training results, with mAP(0.5) reaching 0.987; The results of the detection experiment prove that the trained dirt recognition model has certain universality, and has relatively excellent detection effect on different datasets, and the accuracy rate and recall rate can reach more than 0.8. This work could provide a certain reference for the cleaning research of automatic driving camera sensor.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1117/12.3024700

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Kumar, 2022, Lane detection in intelligent vehicle system using optimal 2- tier deep convolutional neural network[J], Multimedia Tools and Applications, 82
  2. Runwu, 2023, CNN-Transformer for visual-tactile fusion applied in road recognition of autonomous vehicles[J], Pattern Recognition Letters, 166
  3. Shao, 2021, A Survey of Intelligent Sensing Technologies in Autonomous Driving[J], Zte Technology: English version, 19, 8.1.2
  4. Das, 2019, SoildNet: Soiling Degradation Detection in Autonomous Driving[J]

Authors
Wu, Z., Wang, Y., Ran, L., Hu, Z., Liu, Z., Ding, X., Chen, Z., Shi, Y., & Gao, Z.
Affiliations
Tongji University (CN)
Venue
Second International Conference on Informatics, Networking, and Computing (ICINC 2023)
Publisher
SPIE
Published
2024-04-04
Volume
82
Pages
27
OpenAlex
W4393944049
Cited by
0
References
3
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Informatics, Networking and Computing (ICINC) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Keywords
autonomous vehicles, sensor fouling, YOLOv5, object detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review