Research on sensor dirt recognition of autonomous vehicle camera based on deep learning
Abstract
Intelligent driving technology is an important direction of the current development of automobile technology. The realization of intelligent technology is based on the perception ability of car sensors such as cameras and lidar for the driving environment detection. In the actual driving, the surface pollution of sensors will reduce the safety of intelligent driving vehicles. Therefore, it is very important to realize the automatic recognition of ultra-near-field dirt on the optical surface of car sensors. At present, the research on camera sensor fouling recognition is very scarce, and the relevant public data set for recognition research is also lacking. This paper conducted an in-depth study on the contamination problem of the camera sensor of the autonomous vehicle, independently created a dataset of dirt on the camera sensor, and trained the dataset based on the YOLO-V5 model using this dataset. The results show that the dataset we constructed is quite reasonable, with obvious features and excellent training results, with mAP(0.5) reaching 0.987; The results of the detection experiment prove that the trained dirt recognition model has certain universality, and has relatively excellent detection effect on different datasets, and the accuracy rate and recall rate can reach more than 0.8. This work could provide a certain reference for the cleaning research of automatic driving camera sensor.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Autonomous driving in urban environments: approaches, lessons and challenges
Campbell, M., Egerstedt, M., How, J. P., & Murray, R. M. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2010.0110 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
Vision-Based Autonomous Vehicle Systems Based on Deep Learning: A Systematic Literature Review
Pavel, M. I., Tan, S. Y., & Abdullah, A. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12146831 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Pandey, P., Shukla, A., & Tiwari, R. (2017) · International Journal of Systems Assurance Engineering and Management · doi:10.1007/s13198-017-0663-z · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Contextual deconvolution network for semantic segmentation
Fu, J., Liu, J., Li, Y., Bao, Y., Yan, W., Fang, Z., & Lu, H. (2020) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2019.107152 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Kumar, 2022, Lane detection in intelligent vehicle system using optimal 2- tier deep convolutional neural network[J], Multimedia Tools and Applications, 82
- Runwu, 2023, CNN-Transformer for visual-tactile fusion applied in road recognition of autonomous vehicles[J], Pattern Recognition Letters, 166
- Shao, 2021, A Survey of Intelligent Sensing Technologies in Autonomous Driving[J], Zte Technology: English version, 19, 8.1.2
- Das, 2019, SoildNet: Soiling Degradation Detection in Autonomous Driving[J]
- Authors
- Wu, Z., Wang, Y., Ran, L., Hu, Z., Liu, Z., Ding, X., Chen, Z., Shi, Y., & Gao, Z.
- Affiliations
- Tongji University (CN)
- Venue
- Second International Conference on Informatics, Networking, and Computing (ICINC 2023)
- Publisher
- SPIE
- Published
- 2024-04-04
- Volume
- 82
- Pages
- 27
- OpenAlex
- W4393944049
- Semantic Scholar
- 8a12ef2aea42209e50ef0b371ffb8633e3407aaa
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Informatics, Networking and Computing (ICINC) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
- Keywords
- autonomous vehicles, sensor fouling, YOLOv5, object detection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review