The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Independent component representations for face recognition:
Abstract
In a task such as face recognition, much of the important information may be contained in the high-order relationships among the image pixels. A number of face recognition algorithms employ principal component analysis (PCA), which is based on the second-order statistics of the image set, and does not address high-order statistical dependencies such as the relationships among three or more pixels. Independent component analysis (ICA) is a generalization of PCA which separates the high-order moments of the input in addition to the second-order moments. ICA was performed on a set of face images by an unsupervised learning algorithm derived from the principle of optimal information transfer through sigmoidal neurons. The algorithm maximizes the mutual information between the input and the output, which produces statistically independent outputs under certain conditions. ICA was performed on the face images under two different architectures. The first architecture provided a statistically independent basis set for the face images that can be viewed as a set of independent facial features. The second architecture provided a factorial code, in which the probability of any combination of features can be obtained from the product of their individual probabilities. Both ICA representations were superior to representations based on principal components analysis for recognizing faces across sessions and changes in expression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Turk, M., & Pentland, A. (1991) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1991.3.1.71 · Cited by 13,733
An Information-Maximization Approach to Blind Separation and Blind Deconvolution
Bell, A. J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1995) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1995.7.6.1129 · Cited by 8,986
Cited by
Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization
Lee, D. D., & Seung, H. S. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/44565 · Cited by 13,868
Recognizing faces with PCA and ICA
Draper, B. A., Baek, K., Bartlett, M. S., & Beveridge, J. R. (2003) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/s1077-3142(03)00077-8 · Cited by 549
An Efficient Multimodal 2D-3D Hybrid Approach to Automatic Face Recognition
Mian, A., Bennamoun, M., & Owens, R. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2007.1105 · Cited by 470
Independent component analysis of gabor features for face recognition
Liu, C., & Wechsler, H. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.2003.813829 · Cited by 466
Nonnegative Matrix Factorization: An Analytical and Interpretive Tool in Computational Biology
Devarajan, K. (2008) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000029 · Cited by 454
Metadata
- Authors
- Stewart Bartlett, M., Lades, M. H., & Sejnowski, T. J.
- Venue
- SPIE Proceedings
- Publisher
- SPIE
- Published
- 1998-07-17
- ISSN
- 0277-786X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035782554
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.34
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Independent component representations for face recognition:. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1117/12.320144
- The paper
- Stewart Bartlett, M., Lades, M. H., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1998). Independent component representations for face recognition:. SPIE Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.320144
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.