The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measurement study of peer-to-peer file sharing systems:
Abstract
The popularity of peer-to-peer multimedia file sharing applications such as Gnutella and Napster has created a flurry of recent research activity into peer-to-peer architectures. We believe that the proper evaluation of a peer-to-peer system must take into account the characteristics of the peers that choose to participate. Surprisingly, however, few of the peer-to-peer architectures currently being developed are evaluated with respect to such considerations. In this paper, we remedy this situation by performing a detailed measurement study of the two popular peer-to-peer file sharing systems, namely Napster and Gnutella. In particular, our measurement study seeks to precisely characterize the population of end-user hosts that participate in these two systems. This characterization includes the bottleneck bandwidths between these hosts and the Internet at large, IP-level latencies to send packets to these hosts, how often hosts connect and disconnect from the system, how many files hosts share and download, the degree of cooperation between the hosts, and several correlations between these characteristics. Our measurements show that there is significant heterogeneity and lack of cooperation across peers participating in these systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Cited by
The EigenTrust algorithm for reputation management in P2P networks
Kamvar, S. D., Schlosser, M. T., & Garcia-Molina, H. (2003) · Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on World Wide Web - WWW '03 · doi:10.1145/775152.775242 · Cited by 3,362
The Bittorrent P2P File-Sharing System: Measurements and Analysis
Pouwelse, J., Garbacki, P., Epema, D., & Sips, H. (2005) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11558989_19 · Cited by 760
Karagiannis, T., Broido, A., Brownlee, N., Claffy, K. C., & Faloutsos, M. (2005) · IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2004. GLOBECOM '04. · doi:10.1109/glocom.2004.1378239 · Cited by 504
Distributed and cloud computing: from parallel processing to the Internet of things
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-5712 · Cited by 314
A game theoretic framework for incentives in P2P systems
Buragohain, C., Agrawal, D., & Suri, S. (2004) · Proceedings Third International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing (P2P2003) · doi:10.1109/ptp.2003.1231503 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Saroiu, S., Gummadi, P. K., & Gribble, S. D.
- Venue
- SPIE Proceedings
- Publisher
- SPIE
- Published
- 2001-12-10
- Volume
- 4673
- Pages
- 156-170
- ISSN
- 0277-786X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2056363353
- Cited by
- 1,905
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 60.76
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurement study of peer-to-peer file sharing systems:. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1117/12.449977
- The paper
- Saroiu, S., Gummadi, P. K., & Gribble, S. D. (2001). Measurement study of peer-to-peer file sharing systems:. SPIE Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.449977
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.