The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ablation of ceramics with ultraviolet, visible, and infrared nanosecond laser pulses:
Abstract
Laser ablation of alumina (Al2O3), aluminum nitride (AIN) and silicon nitride (Si3N4) ceramics by 6 ns Nd:YAG laser operating at wavelengths of 1064 nm, 532 nm and 355 nm is studied. For all materials the maximum ablation rate is observed at wavelength 1064 nm, and the smallest one for irradiation at 532 nm in the case of Si3N4 and AIN. The numerical model, based on the heat-transfer equation describes the temperature distribution in the material and the evaporation process. The calculated depths of the drilled holes are in agreement with experiment.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For semiconducting and dielectric materials, the initial ablation rate in absence of a light-extinction colloid can be higher at red and near IR wavelengths under specific conditions due to differences in the ablation mechanism compared to metals.
“Note that for semiconducting and dielectric materials the initial ablation rate in absence of a light-extinction colloid can be higher at red and near IR wavelengths under specific conditions due to differences in the ablation mechanism compared to metals [80,81].”
From Nanoparticles Engineering by Pulsed Laser Ablation in Liquids: Concepts and Applications (2020) · cites this paper as [80]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nanoparticles Engineering by Pulsed Laser Ablation in Liquids: Concepts and Applications
Fazio, E., Gökce, B., De Giacomo, A., Meneghetti, M., Compagnini, G., Tommasini, M., Waag, F., Lucotti, A., Zanchi, C. G., Ossi, P. M., et al. (2020) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano10112317 · Cited by 346
“Note that for semiconducting and dielectric materials the initial ablation rate in absence of a light-extinction colloid can be higher at red and near IR wavelengths under specific conditions due to differences in the ablation mechanism compared to metals [80,81].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Nedialkov, N. N., Atanasov, P. A., Sawczak, M., & Sliwinski, G.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Electronics (BG)
- Institute of Fluid Flow-Machinery (PL)
- ORCID
- Sawczak, M.
- Venue
- SPIE Proceedings
- Publisher
- SPIE
- Published
- 2003-11-07
- Pages
- 703-708
- ISSN
- 0277-786X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2048117855
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Laser Material Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
- Keywords
- laser ablation, ceramics, alumina, aluminum nitride, silicon nitride, nanosecond laser pulses, Nd:YAG laser, ultraviolet laser, visible lasers, infrared laser, ablation rate, wavelength dependence, heat transfer modeling, temperature distribution, evaporation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
