The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Femtosecond versus picosecond laser ablation (Keynote Address)
Abstract
Results of ablation of different materials by femtosecond and picosecond laser pulses are compared. Advantages and disadvantages of both laser systems are discussed. Two most important criteria, processing speed and quality of the fabricated structures, are addressed. High repetition rate picosecond lasers allow high speed cutting of thin metal foils and silicon wafers, whereas for micro-drilling it is more advantageous to use femtosecond laser systems.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Increasing pulse width results in a decrease in penetration depth.
“An increasing pulse width results in a decrease in the penetration depth.107,108”
From Green nanoparticle synthesis at scale: a perspective on overcoming the limits of pulsed laser ablation in liquids for high-throughput production (2023) · cites this paper as [108]
Citations
Cites
Compression of amplified chirped optical pulses
Strickland, D., & Mourou, G. (1985) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/0030-4018(85)90120-8 · Cited by 3,937
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Generation of nanoparticle colloids by picosecond and femtosecond laser ablations in liquid flow
Barcikowski, S., Menéndez-Manjón, A., Chichkov, B., Brikas, M., & Račiukaitis, G. (2007) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.2773937 · Cited by 225
Self-citationKhairani, I. Y., Mínguez-Vega, G., Doñate-Buendía, C., & Gökce, B. (2023) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/d3cp01214j · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- Ostendorf, A., Kamlage, G., Klug, U., Korte, F., & Chichkov, B. N.
- Affiliations
- Laser Zentrum Hannover (DE)
- Venue
- SPIE Proceedings
- Publisher
- SPIE
- Published
- 2005-04-12
- Volume
- 5713
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 0277-786X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1987827178
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 6.11
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Laser Material Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles
- Keywords
- laser ablation, femtosecond laser, picosecond laser, laser cutting, micro-drilling, thin metal foils, silicon wafers, processing speed, high repetition rate lasers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
