Cited by 29Terahertz technology and applicationsScientific Measurement and Uncertainty EvaluationMicrowave and Dielectric Measurement Techniques

Analysis of measurement uncertainty in THz-TDS

Withayachumnankul, W., Lin, H., Mickan, S. P., Fischer, B. M., Abbott, D.·2007·SPIE Proceedings

Abstract

Measurement precision is often required in the process of material parameter extraction. This fact is applicable to terahertz time-domain spectroscopy (THz-TDS), which is able to determine the optical/dielectric constants of material in the T-ray regime. Essentially, an ultrafast-pulsed THz-TDS system is composed of several mechanical, optical, and electronic parts, each of which is limited in precision. In operation, the uncertainties of these parts, along with the uncertainties introduced during the parameter extraction process, contribute to the overall uncertainty appearing at the output, i.e. the uncertainty in the extracted optical constants. This paper analyzes the sources of uncertainty and models error propagation through the process.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1117/12.721876

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In THz-TDS, various noise effects compromise signal quality; noise contributions include optical and electronic effects, laser intensity variations, and jitter noise.

    “In THz-TDS, various noise effects compromise the signal quality [23 -25]. Noise contributions include optical and electronic effects [26, 27], laser intensity variations [28], and jitter noise [29, 30].”
  • Jitter noise has an equally significant impact on the attainable SNR level.

    “In this section, we are going to discuss the effect of jitter noise, which has an equally significant impact on the attainable SNR level [25, 29, 32, 33].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 29

Authors
Withayachumnankul, W., Lin, H., Mickan, S. P., Fischer, B. M., & Abbott, D.
Affiliations
The University of Adelaide (AU)
Venue
SPIE Proceedings
Publisher
SPIE
Published
2007-05-18
Volume
6593
Pages
659326
ISSN
0277-786X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2164650419
Cited by
29
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.02
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Terahertz technology and applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Microwave and Dielectric Measurement Techniques
Keywords
measurement uncertainty, terahertz time-domain spectroscopy, error propagation, optical constants, dielectric constant, material parameter identification, uncertainty sources

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review