The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Optimization of x‐ray imaging geometry (with specific application to flat‐panel cone‐beam computed tomography)
Abstract
A theoretical method is presented that allows identification of optimal x‐ray imaging geometry, considering the effects of x‐ray source distribution, imaging task, x‐ray scatter, and imager detective quantum efficiency (DQE). Each of these factors is incorporated into the ICRU‐recommended figure of merit for image quality, the detectability index, which is maximized to determine the optimal system configuration. Cascaded systems analysis of flat‐panel imagers (FPIs) is extended to incorporate the effects of x‐ray scatter directly in the DQE, showing that x‐ray scatter degrades DQE as an additive noise source. Optimal magnification is computed for FPI configurations appropriate to (but not limited to) cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT). The sensitivity of the results is examined as a function of focal spot size, imaging task (e.g., ideal observer detection or discrimination tasks), x‐ray scatter fraction, detector resolution, and additive noise. Nominal conditions for FPI‐CBCT result in optimal magnification of ∼1.4–1.6, depending primarily on the magnitude of the x‐ray scatter fraction. The methodology is sufficiently general that examination of optimal geometry for other FPI applications (e.g., chest radiography, fluoroscopy, and mammography) is possible. The degree to which increased exposure can be used to compensate for x‐ray scatter degradation is quantified.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evaluation of sparse-view reconstruction from flat-panel-detector cone-beam CT
Bian, J., Siewerdsen, J. H., Han, X., Sidky, E. Y., Prince, J. L., Pelizzari, C. A., & Pan, X. (2010) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/55/22/001 · Cited by 373
Self-citationSiewerdsen, J. H., Daly, M. J., Bakhtiar, B., Moseley, D. J., Richard, S., Keller, H., & Jaffray, D. A. (2006) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.2148916 · Cited by 283
Self-citationCone‐beam volume CT breast imaging: Feasibility study
Chen, B., & Ning, R. (2002) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.1461843 · Cited by 277
Sisniega, A., Zbijewski, W., Badal, A., Kyprianou, I. S., Stayman, J. W., Vaquero, J. J., & Siewerdsen, J. H. (2013) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.4801895 · Cited by 117
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Siewerdsen, J. H., & Jaffray, D. A.
- Venue
- Medical Physics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1903-1914
- ISSN
- 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
- 2473-4209
- OpenAlex
- W2021005515
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimization of x‐ray imaging geometry (with specific application to flat‐panel cone‐beam computed tomography). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1118/1.1286590
- The paper
- Siewerdsen, J. H., & Jaffray, D. A. (2000). Optimization of x‐ray imaging geometry (with specific application to flat‐panel cone‐beam computed tomography). Medical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1286590
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.