The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assessing the future of diffuse optical imaging technologies for breast cancer management
Open accessAbstract
Diffuse optical imaging (DOI) is a noninvasive optical technique that employs near‐infrared(NIR) light to quantitatively characterize the optical properties of thick tissues. Although NIR methods were first applied to breast transillumination (also called diaphanography) nearly 80 years ago, quantitative DOI methods employing time‐ or frequency‐domain photon migration technologies have only recently been used for breast imaging(i.e., since the mid‐1990s). In this review, the state of the art in DOI for breast cancer is outlined and a multi‐institutional Network for Translational Research in Optical Imaging (NTROI) is described, which has been formed by the National Cancer Institute to advance diffuse optical spectroscopy and imaging (DOSI) for the purpose of improving breast cancer detection and clinical management. DOSI employs broadband technology both in near‐infrared spectral and temporal signal domains in order to separate absorption from scattering and quantify uptake of multiple molecular probes based on absorption or fluorescence contrast. Additional dimensionality in the data is provided by integrating and co‐registering the functional information of DOSI with x‐ray mammography and magnetic resonance imaging(MRI), which provide structural information or vascular flow information, respectively. Factors affecting DOSI performance, such as intrinsic and extrinsic contrast mechanisms, quantitation of biochemical components, image formation/visualization, and multimodality co‐registration are under investigation in the ongoing research NTROI sites. One of the goals is to develop standardized DOSI platforms that can be used as stand‐alone devices or in conjunction with MRI, mammography, or ultrasound. This broad‐based, multidisciplinary effort is expected to provide new insight regarding the origins of breast disease and practical approaches for addressing several key challenges in breast cancer, including: Detecting disease in mammographically dense tissue, distinguishing between malignant and benign lesions, and understanding the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
van Dam, G. M., Themelis, G., Crane, L. M. A., Harlaar, N. J., Pleijhuis, R. G., Kelder, W., Sarantopoulos, A., de Jong, J. S., Arts, H. J. G., van der Zee, A. G. J., et al. (2011) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.2472 · Cited by 1,545
Raman imaging at biological interfaces: applications in breast cancer diagnosis
Surmacki, J., Musial, J., Kordek, R., & Abramczyk, H. (2013) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/1476-4598-12-48 · Cited by 143
Metadata
- Authors
- Tromberg, B. J., Pogue, B. W., Paulsen, K. D., Yodh, A. G., Boas, D. A., & Cerussi, A. E.
- Venue
- Medical Physics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-05-22
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 6Part1
- Pages
- 2443-2451
- ISSN
- 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
- 2473-4209
- OpenAlex
- W2140512870
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing the future of diffuse optical imaging technologies for breast cancer management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1118/1.2919078
- The paper
- Tromberg, B. J., Pogue, B. W., Paulsen, K. D., Yodh, A. G., Boas, D. A., & Cerussi, A. E. (2008). Assessing the future of diffuse optical imaging technologies for breast cancer management. Medical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2919078
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.