The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Some implications of linear‐quadratic‐linear radiation dose‐response with regard to hypofractionation
Abstract
Recent technological advances enable radiation therapy to be delivered in a highly conformal manner to targets located almost anywhere in the body. This capability has renewed the clinical interest in hypofractionation wherein the tumor is delivered a few fractions of very large dose per fraction. Extrapolating clinical experience from conventional regimens to fractions of high dose is important to designing hypofractionated treatments. The concept of biologically effective dose (BED) based on the linear‐quadratic (LQ) formulation is a useful tool for intercomparing conventional fractionations but may be hampered if the value of is dose range dependent and/or when extrapolating to fractions of high dose because the LQ curve bends continuously on the log‐linear plot. This does not coincide with what is observed experimentally in many clonogenic cell survival studies at high dose wherein radiation dose‐response relationships more closely approximate a straight line. Intercomparison of conventional fractionations with hypofractionated regimens may benefit from BED calculations which instead use a dose range independent linear‐quadratic‐linear (LQ‐L) formulation which better fits the experimental data across a wider range of dose. The dosimetric implications of LQ‐L are explored using a simple model which requires only the specification of a dose at which the LQ curve transitions to final linearity and the cell kill per Gy in the final linear portion of the survival curve at high dose. It is shown that the line tangent to the LQ curve at transition dose can often be used to approximate the final slope of the dose response curve. When Gy, the line tangent to the LQ curve at intersects the and curves at dose Gy and also closely fits the linear response in the high dose region of some classic in vitro cell survival curves for which the value of is low. It is hypothesized that will increase as the magnitude of increases. Examples are presented illustrating how to recognize LQ‐L behavior in multifraction isoeffect studies of late responses such as spinal cord and lung. When planning hypofractionated regimens involving reactions with low , recognizing LQ‐L behavior could be important because the dose‐response is likely to transition to final linearity within the contemplated range of hypofractional doses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ACTION OF X-RAYS ON MAMMALIAN CELLS
Puck, T. T., & Marcus, P. I. (1956) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.103.5.653 · Cited by 1,696
Cited by
The linear quadratic model: usage, interpretation and challenges
McMahon, S. J. (2018) · Physics in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/aaf26a · Cited by 440
Elsässer, T., Weyrather, W. K., Friedrich, T., Durante, M., Iancu, G., Krämer, M., Kragl, G., Brons, S., Winter, M., Weber, K.-J., et al. (2010) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.05.014 · Cited by 351
Friedrich, T., Scholz, U., ElsaSser, T., Durante, M., & Scholz, M. (2013) · Journal of Radiation Research · doi:10.1093/jrr/rrs114 · Cited by 287
Dunlap, N. E., Cai, J., Biedermann, G. B., Yang, W., Benedict, S. H., Sheng, K., Schefter, T. E., Kavanagh, B. D., & Larner, J. M. (2010) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.027 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Astrahan, M.
- Venue
- Medical Physics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-08-20
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 4161-4172
- ISSN
- 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
- 2473-4209
- OpenAlex
- W1997925433
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Some implications of linear‐quadratic‐linear radiation dose‐response with regard to hypofractionation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1118/1.2969065
- The paper
- Astrahan, M. (2008). Some implications of linear‐quadratic‐linear radiation dose‐response with regard to hypofractionation. Medical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2969065
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.