Cited by 1,696Effects of Radiation ExposureRadiation Therapy and DosimetryDNA Repair Mechanisms

ACTION OF X-RAYS ON MAMMALIAN CELLS

Open access
Puck, Theodore T., Marcus, Philip I.·1956·The Journal of Experimental Medicine

Abstract

The effects of x-irradiation have been quantitatively studied on single cells of a human cervical carcinoma (HeLa) under conditions such that 100 per cent of the unirradiated cells reproduce in isolation to form macroscopic colonies. This technique eliminates complexities due to interactions of members of large cell populations. Survival of single cells (defined as the ability to form a macroscopic colony within 15 days) yields a typical 2 hit curve when plotted against x-ray dose. The initial shoulder extends to about 75 r, after which a linear logarithmic survival rate is obtained, in which the dose needed to reduce survivors to 37 per cent is 96 r. This radiation sensitivity is tens to hundreds of times greater than that of any microorganism for which the equivalent function bas been studied. Evidence, though not proof, is presented that the lethal effect is due to a radiation-induced genetic defect which, however, cannot be a simple single gene inactivation. The locus of the action could be chromosomal. Beginning at doses of 100 r, or possibly earlier, growth-delaying effects of radiation are visible. Cells in which the ability to reproduce has been destroyed by doses below 800 r, can still multiply several times. At higher doses even a single cell division is precluded. A large proportion of the cells killed by radiation at any dose gives rise to one or more giant cells. These metabolize actively, grow to huge proportions but never reproduce under the experimental conditions employed. Methods of preparing large populations of giant cells are described. These giants are particularly susceptible to virus action. Some of the irradiated cells disappear from the plate, presumably by disintegration. This action of radiation is by far the least efficient, since even after 10,000 r, 5 to 10 per cent of the original cell inoculum is recoverable as giants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1084/jem.103.5.653

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 3-7 Gy of X-ray induces severe DNA damage in mammalian cells, leading to loss of proliferative ability.

    “In general, 3–7 Gy of X-ray induces severe DNA damage in mammalian cells, leading to loss of proliferative ability36.”

    From Extremotolerant tardigrade genome and improved radiotolerance of human cultured cells by tardigrade-unique protein (2016) · cites this paper as [36]

    The Results and Discussion (pp. 657–662) report loss of colony-forming ability after X-ray exposure in HeLa cells, including at doses up to 600 r. The paper does not give the claimed 3–7 Gy range or establish severe DNA damage as the cause; its summary presents a radiation-induced genetic defect as evidence, not proof. The finding is also from HeLa cells rather than mammalian cells generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Puck, T. T., & Marcus, P. I.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Denver (US)
Venue
The Journal of Experimental Medicine
Published
1956-05-01
Volume
103
Issue
5
Pages
653-666
ISSN
  • 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-9538
OpenAlex
W2109126550
Cited by
1,696
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 38
FWCI
63.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • The Journal of Experimental Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
Keywords
X-ray irradiation, HeLa cells, cervical cancer, cell survival curves, two-hit model, chromosomal damage, growth delay, giant cells, viral susceptibility
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Division, Cell Survival, Humans, Neoplasms, Radiation Tolerance, X-Rays, Survival Rate, Tissue Culture Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review