The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Compressed sensing based cone‐beam computed tomography reconstruction with a first‐order methoda)
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: This article considers the problem of reconstructing cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) images from a set of undersampled and potentially noisy projection measurements. Methods: The authors cast the reconstruction as a compressed sensing problem based on norm minimization constrained by statistically weighted least‐squares of CBCT projection data. For accurate modeling, the noise characteristics of the CBCT projection data are used to determine the relative importance of each projection measurement. To solve the compressed sensing problem, the authors employ a method minimizing total‐variation norm, satisfying a prespecified level of measurement consistency using a first‐order method developed by Nesterov. Results: The method converges fast to the optimal solution without excessive memory requirement, thanks to the method of iterative forward and back‐projections. The performance of the proposed algorithm is demonstrated through a series of digital and experimental phantom studies. It is found a that high quality CBCT image can be reconstructed from undersampled and potentially noisy projection data by using the proposed method. Both sparse sampling and decreasing x‐ray tube current (i.e., noisy projection data) lead to the reduction of radiation dose in CBCT imaging. Conclusions: It is demonstrated that compressed sensing outperforms the traditional algorithm when dealing with sparse, and potentially noisy, CBCT projection views.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601
Self-citationDonoho, D. L. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2006.871582 · Cited by 23,994
Donoho, D. L. (2004) · Cited by 16,703
Candes, E. J., Romberg, J., & Tao, T. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2005.862083 · Cited by 15,639
Computed Tomography — An Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure
Brenner, D. J., & Hall, E. J. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra072149 · Cited by 8,748
Near-Optimal Signal Recovery From Random Projections: Universal Encoding Strategies?
Candes, E. J., & Tao, T. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2006.885507 · Cited by 6,839
Feldkamp, L. A., Davis, L. C., & Kress, J. W. (1984) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.1.000612 · Cited by 6,319
Figueiredo, M. A. T., Nowak, R. D., & Wright, S. J. (2007) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2007.910281 · Cited by 3,524
An Interior-Point Method for Large-Scale -Regularized Least Squares
Kim, S.-J., Koh, K., Lustig, M., Boyd, S., & Gorinevsky, D. (2007) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2007.910971 · Cited by 2,083
Self-citationSidky, E. Y., & Pan, X. (2008) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/53/17/021 · Cited by 1,995
Cited by
Wu, J., Wang, X., Mou, X., Chen, Y., & Liu, S. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20061647 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Choi, K., Wang, J., Zhu, L., Suh, T., Boyd, S., & Xing, L.
- Venue
- Medical Physics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-08-31
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 5113-5125
- ISSN
- 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
- 2473-4209
- OpenAlex
- W2042653706
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 21.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Compressed sensing based cone‐beam computed tomography reconstruction with a first‐order methoda). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1118/1.3481510
- The paper
- Choi, K., Wang, J., Zhu, L., Suh, T., Boyd, S., & Xing, L. (2010). Compressed sensing based cone‐beam computed tomography reconstruction with a first‐order methoda). Medical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3481510
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.