The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
GPU computing in medical physics: A review
Abstract
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has emerged as a competitive platform for computing massively parallel problems. Many computing applications in medical physics can be formulated as data-parallel tasks that exploit the capabilities of the GPU for reducing processing times. The authors review the basic principles of GPU computing as well as the main performance optimization techniques, and survey existing applications in three areas of medical physics, namely image reconstruction, dose calculation and treatment plan optimization, and image processing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fast Deformable Registration on the GPU: A CUDA Implementation of Demons
Muyan-Ozcelik, P., Owens, J. D., Xia, J., & Samant, S. S. (2008) · 2008 International Conference on Computational Sciences and Its Applications · doi:10.1109/iccsa.2008.22 · Cited by 115
GIST: an interactive, GPU-based level set segmentation tool for 3D medical images
CATES, J., LEFOHN, A., & WHITAKER, R. (2004) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2004.06.022 · Cited by 102
High-performance cone beam reconstruction using CUDA compatible GPUs
Okitsu, Y., Ino, F., & Hagihara, K. (2010) · Parallel Computing · doi:10.1016/j.parco.2010.01.004 · Cited by 70
Cited by
Medical image segmentation on GPUs – A comprehensive review
Smistad, E., Falch, T. L., Bozorgi, M., Elster, A. C., & Lindseth, F. (2015) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2014.10.012 · Cited by 264
4D MR phase and magnitude segmentations with GPU parallel computing
Bergen, R. V., Lin, H.-Y., Alexander, M. E., & Bidinosti, C. P. (2015) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.mri.2014.08.019 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Pratx, G., & Xing, L.
- Venue
- Medical Physics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-05-09
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2685-2697
- ISSN
- 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2055844022
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 43.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
