The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: Theoretical analysis of detective quantum efficiency
Abstract
A flat‐panel x‐ray imaging detector using a layer of amorphous selenium (‐Se) for direct conversion of x rays (to charge) and an active matrix for self‐scanned readout is being investigated for digital radiology. A theoretical analysis of the spatial frequency dependent detective quantum efficiency of the self‐scanned ‐Se detector is performed based on a model of signal and noise propagation in a cascaded imaging system. Because of the high intrinsic resolution of ‐Se and the pixelated active matrix readout method, such detectors are inherently undersampled and aliasing is present. The presampling modulation transfer function (MTF) and aliased noise power spectrum (NPS) of the detector were used in the analysis of It is proven that the aliased NPS for the self‐scanned ‐Se detectors is white. Since the shape of is determined by the ratio of MTF squared and the NPS, the shape of follows the square of the presampling MTF of the detector as a result of the white NPS. The analysis also shows that DQE(0) is proportional to the pixel fill factor, i.e., the fraction of each pixel area used for image charge collection. The DQE analysis is applied to detector parameters for three x‐ray imaging applications: mammography, chest radiography, and fluoroscopy. The effects of pixel fill factor, imaging geometry (i.e., incident angle of x rays), and various sources of electronic noise on the detector are discussed. Strategies for maximizing detector DQE for each x‐ray imaging application are proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Spektr: A computational tool for x‐ray spectral analysis and imaging system optimization
Siewerdsen, J. H., Waese, A. M., Moseley, D. J., Richard, S., & Jaffray, D. A. (2004) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.1758350 · Cited by 279
Cone‐beam volume CT breast imaging: Feasibility study
Chen, B., & Ning, R. (2002) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.1461843 · Cited by 277
Noise correlation in CBCT projection data and its application for noise reduction in low‐dose CBCT
Zhang, H., Ouyang, L., Ma, J., Huang, J., Chen, W., & Wang, J. (2014) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.4865782 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, W., & Rowlands, J. A.
- Venue
- Medical Physics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1819-1833
- ISSN
- 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
- 2473-4209
- OpenAlex
- W2076029021
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: Theoretical analysis of detective quantum efficiency. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1118/1.598097
- The paper
- Zhao, W., & Rowlands, J. A. (1997). Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: Theoretical analysis of detective quantum efficiency. Medical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.598097
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.