The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Efficient correction for CT image artifacts caused by objects extending outside the scan field of view
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to develop a method of eliminating CT image artifacts generated by objects extending outside the scan field of view, such as obese or inadequately positioned patients. CT projection data are measured only within the scan field of view and thus are abruptly discontinuous at the projection boundaries if the scanned object extends outside the scan field of view. This data discontinuity causes an artifact that consists of a bright peripheral band that obscures objects near the boundary of the scan field of view. An adaptive mathematical extrapolation scheme with low computational expense was applied to reduce the data discontinuity prior to convolution in a filtered backprojection reconstruction. Despite extended projection length, the convolution length was not increased and thus the reconstruction time was not affected. Raw projection data from ten patients whose bodies extended beyond the scan field of view were reconstructed using a conventional method and our extended reconstruction method. Limitations of the algorithm are investigated and extensions for further improvement are discussed. The images reconstructed by conventional filtered backprojection demonstrated peripheral bright‐band artifacts near the boundary of the scan field of view. Images reconstructed with our technique were free of such artifacts and clearly showed the anatomy at the periphery of the scan field of view with correct attenuation values. We conclude that bright‐band artifacts generated by obese patients whose bodies extend beyond the scan field of view were eliminated with our reconstruction method, which reduces boundary data discontinuity. The algorithm can be generalized to objects with inhomogeneous peripheral density and to true “Region of Interest Reconstruction” from truncated projections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Maire, E., & Withers, P. J. (2014) · International Materials Reviews · doi:10.1179/1743280413y.0000000023 · Cited by 1,374
Improved total variation-based CT image reconstruction applied to clinical data
Ritschl, L., Bergner, F., Fleischmann, C., & Kachelrieß, M. (2011) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/56/6/003 · Cited by 306
Flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT)
Kalender, W. A., & Kyriakou, Y. (2007) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-007-0651-9 · Cited by 302
Marker‐free motion correction in weight‐bearing cone‐beam CT of the knee joint
Berger, M., Müller, K., Aichert, A., Unberath, M., Thies, J., Choi, J. ‐., Fahrig, R., & Maier, A. (2016) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.4941012 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Ohnesorge, B., Flohr, T., Schwarz, K., Heiken, J. P., & Bae, K. T.
- Venue
- Medical Physics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 39-46
- ISSN
- 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
- 2473-4209
- OpenAlex
- W1979565583
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficient correction for CT image artifacts caused by objects extending outside the scan field of view. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1118/1.598855
- The paper
- Ohnesorge, B., Flohr, T., Schwarz, K., Heiken, J. P., & Bae, K. T. (2000). Efficient correction for CT image artifacts caused by objects extending outside the scan field of view. Medical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.598855
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.