Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,197

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Unified equations for the slope, intercept, and standard errors of the best straight line

York, Derek, Evensen, Norman M., Martı́nez, Margarita López, De Basabe Delgado, Jonás·2004·American Journal of Physics

Abstract

It has long been recognized that the least-squares estimation method of fitting the best straight line to data points having normally distributed errors yields identical results for the slope and intercept of the line as does the method of maximum likelihood estimation. We show that, contrary to previous understanding, these two methods also give identical results for the standard errors in slope and intercept, provided that the least-squares estimation expressions are evaluated at the least-squares-adjusted points rather than at the observed points as has been done traditionally. This unification of standard errors holds when both x and y observations are subject to correlated errors that vary from point to point. All known correct regression solutions in the literature, including various special cases, can be derived from the original York equations. We present a compact set of equations for the slope, intercept, and newly unified standard errors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1119/1.1632486

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. 1966, Least-squares fitting of a straight line, Can. J. Phys., 44, 1079, 10.1139/p66-090 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 1989, Linear least-squares fits with errors in both coordinates, Am. J. Phys., 57, 642, 10.1119/1.15963 · DOI
  3. 1969, Least squares fitting of a straight line with correlated errors, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 5, 320
  4. 1950, Organic correlation and allometry, Biometrika, 37, 30, 10.2307/2332144 · doi:10.2307/2332144
  5. 1901, On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space, Philos. Mag., 2, 559
  6. 1968, A two-error regression treatment and its application to Rb-Sr and initial Sr87/Sr86 ratios of younger Variscan granitic rocks from the Schwarzwald Massif, Southwest Germany, J. Geophys. Res., 73, 6071, 10.1029/JB073i018p06071 · doi:10.1029/jb073i018p06071
  7. 1992, Linear least-squares fits with errors in both coordinates. II. Comments on parameter variances, Am. J. Phys., 60, 59, 10.1119/1.17044 · DOI
  8. 1979, On the fitting of parallel isochrons and the method of maximum likelihood, Chem. Geol., 26, 183, 10.1016/0009-2541(79)90045-7 · DOI
  9. 1979, Rb87-87Sr chronology of enstatite meteorites, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 44, 420, 10.1016/0012-821X(79)90081-5 · DOI
  10. 1971, Ar40-39Ar ages from lunar maria, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 11, 169, 10.1016/0012-821X(71)90161-0 · DOI

Cited by

See all 1,197

Metadata

Authors
York, D., Evensen, N. M., Martı́nez, M. L., & De Basabe Delgado, J.
Venue
American Journal of Physics
Published
2004-02-12
Volume
72
Issue
3
Pages
367-375
ISSN
  • 0002-9505 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-2909
OpenAlex
W2024115582
Cited by
1,197
References
0
FWCI
11.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unified equations for the slope, intercept, and standard errors of the best straight line. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1119/1.1632486
The paper
York, D., Evensen, N. M., Martı́nez, M. L., & De Basabe Delgado, J. (2004). Unified equations for the slope, intercept, and standard errors of the best straight line. American Journal of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1632486

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.