The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups
Abstract
A supportive environment based on cooperative grouping was developed to foster students’ learning of an effective problem-solving strategy. Experiments to adapt the technique of cooperative grouping to physics problem solving were carried out in two diverse settings: a large introductory course at state university, and a small modern physics class at a community college. Groups were more likely to use an effective problem-solving strategy when given context-rich problems to solve than when given standard textbook problems. Well-functioning cooperative groups were found to result from specific structural and management procedures governing group members’ interactions. Group size, the gender and ability composition of groups, seating arrangement, role assignment, textbook use, and group as well as individual testing were all found to contribute to the problem-solving performance of cooperative groups.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Research shows that the consensus-finding crucial for learning in the collaborative stage is best stimulated by complex questions that require higher-level cognitive skills (B. S. Bloom et al., 1964;Heller & Hollabaugh, 1992;Rieger & Rieger, 2020;Stearns, 1996).”
From Active learning through flexible collaborative exams: Improving assessments across disciplines (2026) · cites this paper as Heller & Hollabaugh, 1992
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–731 of 731
Entelektüel Sermaye Yönetimi ve Örgütsel Sürdürülebilirlik Bakış Açısıyla Eğitim Kurumları
Argon, T., & Burukoğlu, S. (2023) · Özgür Yayınları eBooks · doi:10.58830/ozgur.pub171.c856
The Prerequisite of Effective Group Works in Blended Learning Environments: A Literature Review
Dwikristanto, Y. P., Hanafi, I., Kasihani, N. N., Susanto, T. T. D., & Destimianti, A. (2023) · Advances in computer science research · doi:10.2991/978-94-6463-236-1_19
Teaching Complex Introductory Concepts in a Sophomore Circuits Course: A Descriptive Case Study
Pitterson, N. P. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13101022
Perspective on Contemporary Rural Development Transformation: Dialogue and Dialectics
Sujianto, S., Habibie, D. K., Adianto, As'ari, H., & Zulkarnaini, Z. (2023) · Journal of Law and Sustainable Development · doi:10.55908/sdgs.v11i12.2294
Free-Body Diagram Performance with Problem Depictions at Different Levels of Abstraction
Sloboda, A. R. (2024) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--44646
Sloboda, A. R. (2024) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--36997
Omwando, T., Kotla, B., Alhalawani, A., Bosman, L., & Khandha, A. (2024) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--47604
Trinh, V. T. T., Le, T. H. T., Nguyen, A. T., & Tran, N. T. (2024) · Journal of Thu Dau Mot University · doi:10.37550/tdmu.ejs/2024.03.590
A token system for incentivising equal contributions in group work
Guo, S., Carr, S., & Kumi, D. (2025) · Physics Education · doi:10.1088/1361-6552/aded62
Einde, L. V. D., Flammer, K., Perez, C. M., & Phùng, M. (2025) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--56446
Ghimire, A., & Singh, C. (2025) · The journal of college science teaching · doi:10.1080/0047231x.2025.2555895
Guthrie, M. W., Wu, X. H., & Scanlon, E. M. (2025) · The Physics Teacher · doi:10.1119/5.0175809
Can a Small Change in Exam Question Format Help Students? Sadly, Not
Normandeau, M., Newling, B., & Boucher, C. (2025) · The journal of college science teaching · doi:10.1080/0047231x.2025.2576707
Lessons From Research on Reform in Undergraduate Science
(2004) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-60752-542-420251003
(2017) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-68123-959-020251013
Share, rotate, split: The effects of group work role distributions on student outcomes
Feinleib, J., Dew, M., & Holmes, N. G. (2026) · Physical Review Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/1n3c-v2fj
Interdisciplinary Curriculum Planning in a College Course
Christopher, J. E., & Atwood, R. K. (2004) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-60752-542-420251009
Turgut, H., & Ünal, C. E. (2026) · Sakarya University Journal of Education · doi:10.19126/suje.1783637
Using a Collaborative Exam Approach as an Equitable Exam Retake
Kuwada, N. J. (2026) · The Physics Teacher · doi:10.1119/5.0222448
Fong, M. M., Watkins, A., & Herman, G. L. (2026) · Computer Science Education · doi:10.1080/08993408.2026.2667870
Effect of the group size on student learning using an active learning methodology in a science class
Pazmiño, A., Gutiérrez, E. D., & Montero, E. (2026) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/3203/1/012047
Domenichini, D., Fantoni, G., Chiarello, F., & Chiofalo, M. (2026) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/3203/1/012048
Eblen‐Zayas, M. (2026) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/5.0326978
Firdaus, T., & Sinensis, A. R. (2026) · Formatif Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA · doi:10.30998/formatif.v16i2.3479
Tahhan, A., & Arm, K. (2026) · International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s40753-026-00318-5
The physics laboratory in higher education in Libya
Hamed, S. A. (2013) · Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee)
Metadata
- Authors
- Heller, P., & Hollabaugh, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Normandale Community College (US)
- ORCID
- Heller, Patricia
- Venue
- American Journal of Physics
- Published
- 1992-07-01
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 637-644
- ISSN
- 0002-9505 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2909
- OpenAlex
- W2047405957
- Cited by
- 726
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 43
- FWCI
- 3.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Physics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Outcomes
- Keywords
- physics problem solving, problem-solving strategies, context-rich problems, group structure, group management, role assignment, group size, gender composition, seating arrangement, introductory physics, modern physics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review