The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On Experimental Tests of the General Theory of Relativity
Abstract
This paper explores the extent to which the three “crucial tests” support the full structure of the general theory of relativity, and do not merely verify the equivalence principle and the special theory of relativity, which are well established by other experimental evidence. It is shown how the first-order changes in the periods of identically constructed clocks and the lengths of identically constructed measuring rods can be found without using general relativity, and how the red shift and the deflection of light can be computed from them. Only the planetary orbit precession provides a real test of general relativity. Terrestrial or satellite experiments that would go beyond supplying corroborative evidence for the equivalence principle and special relativity would be extremely difficult to perform, and would, for example, require a frequency standard with an accuracy somewhat better than one part in 1018.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics
Will, C. M. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781316338612 · Cited by 3,637
Relativistic gravitation theory for the modified Newtonian dynamics paradigm
Bekenstein, J. D. (2004) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.083509 · Cited by 1,487
Tensor-multi-scalar theories of gravitation
Damour, T., & Esposito-Farese, G. (1992) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/9/9/015 · Cited by 1,016
Rejecting or Accepting Parameter Values in Bayesian Estimation
Kruschke, J. K. (2018) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2515245918771304 · Cited by 734
Quantum tests of the Einstein Equivalence Principle with the STE–QUEST space mission
Altschul, B., Bailey, Q. G., Blanchet, L., Bongs, K., Bouyer, P., Cacciapuoti, L., Capozziello, S., Gaaloul, N., Giulini, D., Hartwig, J., et al. (2015) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2014.07.014 · Cited by 204
Metadata
- Authors
- Schiff, L. I.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physics
- Published
- 1960-04-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 340-343
- ISSN
- 0002-9505 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2909
- OpenAlex
- W2037418735
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On Experimental Tests of the General Theory of Relativity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1119/1.1935800
- The paper
- Schiff, L. I. (1960). On Experimental Tests of the General Theory of Relativity. American Journal of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1935800
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
