Cited by 742Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceStatistical Distribution Estimation and ApplicationsDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Rejecting or Accepting Parameter Values in Bayesian Estimation

Open access
Kruschke, John K.·2018·Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science

Abstract

This article explains a decision rule that uses Bayesian posterior distributions as the basis for accepting or rejecting null values of parameters. This decision rule focuses on the range of plausible values indicated by the highest density interval of the posterior distribution and the relation between this range and a region of practical equivalence (ROPE) around the null value. The article also discusses considerations for setting the limits of a ROPE and emphasizes that analogous considerations apply to setting the decision thresholds for p values and Bayes factors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2515245918771304

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  2. Little, T. A. (2015). Equivalence testing for comparability. BioPharm International, 28(2), 45-48.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kruschke, J. K.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Kruschke, John K.
Venue
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
Published
2018-05-08
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
270-280
ISSN
  • 2515-2459 (ISSN-L)
  • 2515-2467
OpenAlex
W2801776818
Cited by
734
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 99 · 2025: 128 · 2024: 128 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 93 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1
FWCI
41.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks Open (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
Bayesian hypothesis testing, null hypothesis rejection, highest density interval, region of practical equivalence, posterior distribution, decision threshold, p-values, Bayes factor, parameter values

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review