The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers
Abstract
Although most recent multitalker research has emphasized the importance of binaural cues, monaural cues can play an equally important role in the perception of multiple simultaneous speech signals. In this experiment, the intelligibility of a target phrase masked by a single competing masker phrase was measured as a function of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) with same-talker, same-sex, and different-sex target and masker voices. The results indicate that informational masking, rather than energetic masking, dominated performance in this experiment. The amount of masking was highly dependent on the similarity of the target and masker voices: performance was best when different-sex talkers were used and worst when the same talker was used for target and masker. Performance did not, however, improve monotonically with increasing SNR. Intelligibility generally plateaued at SNRs below 0 dB and, in some cases, intensity differences between the target and masking voices produced substantial improvements in performance with decreasing SNR. The results indicate that informational and energetic masking play substantially different roles in the perception of competing speech messages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Speech recognition in adverse conditions: A review.
Mattys, S. L., Davis, M. H., Bradlow, A. R., & Scott, S. K. (2012) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690965.2012.705006 · Cited by 809
The benefit of binaural hearing in a cocktail party: Effect of location and type of interferer
Hawley, M. L., Litovsky, R. Y., & Culling, J. F. (2004) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1639908 · Cited by 538
Defining a left-lateralized response specific to intelligible speech using fMRI
Narain, C. (2003) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhg083 · Cited by 246
Neural correlates of auditory perceptual awareness under informational masking
Gutschalk, A., Micheyl, C., & Oxenham, A. J. (2008) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060138 · Cited by 201
Evans, S., & Davis, M. H. (2015) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv136 · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- Brungart, D. S.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 2001-03-01
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1101-1109
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W1991112797
- Cited by
- 1,139
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.1345696
- The paper
- Brungart, D. S. (2001). Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1345696
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.