The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Production benefits of childhood overhearing
Abstract
The current study assessed whether overhearing Spanish during childhood helps later Spanish pronunciation in adulthood. Our preliminary report based on a subset of the data [Au et al., Psychol. Sci. 13, 238–243 (2002)] revealed that adults who overheard Spanish during childhood had better Spanish pronunciation, but not better morphosyntax, than adult learners of Spanish who had no childhood experience with Spanish. We now present data from the full sample with additional morphosyntax and pronunciation assessments, as well as measures to help rule out possible confounding prosodic factors such as speech rate, phrasing, and stress placement. Three groups of undergraduates were compared: 15 Spanish–English bilinguals (native Spanish speakers), 15 late learners of Spanish who overheard Spanish during childhood (childhood overhearers), 15 late learners of Spanish who had no regular experience with Spanish until middle or high school (typical late L2 learners). Results confirmed a pronunciation advantage for the childhood overhearers over the typical late L2 learners on all measures: phonetic analyses (VOT and degree of lenition), accent ratings (phoneme and story production), but no benefit in morphosyntax. Importantly, the pronunciation advantage did not seem attributable to prosodic factors. These findings illustrate the specificity of overhearers’ advantage to phonological production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure: A New Scale for Use with Diverse Groups
Phinney, J. S. (1992) · Journal of Adolescent Research · doi:10.1177/074355489272003 · Cited by 3,813
Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/s0163-6383(84)80022-3 · Cited by 2,801
Incidental Language Learning: Listening (and Learning) Out of the Corner of Your Ear
Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., Aslin, R. N., Tunick, R. A., & Barrueco, S. (1997) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00690.x · Cited by 675
The critical period for language acquisition: Evidence from second language learning
Snow, C. E., & Hoefnagel-Hohle, M. (1978) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1128751 · Cited by 607
Tees, R. C., & Werker, J. F. (1984) · Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie · doi:10.1037/h0080868 · Cited by 214
Cited by
Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code
Kuhl, P. K. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1533 · Cited by 2,291
The Acquisition of Heritage Languages
Montrul, S. (2015) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139030502 · Cited by 900
Heritage languages and their speakers: Opportunities and challenges for linguistics
Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., & Polinsky, M. (2013) · Theoretical Linguistics · doi:10.1515/tl-2013-0009 · Cited by 758
Montrul, S., Foote, R., & Perpiñán, S. (2008) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00449.x · Cited by 516
Current Issues in Heritage Language Acquisition
Montrul, S. (2010) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190510000103 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Knightly, L. M., Jun, S.-A., Oh, J. S., & Au, T. K.-F.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 2003-07-01
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 465-474
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2080609532
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 2.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Production benefits of childhood overhearing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.1577560
- The paper
- Knightly, L. M., Jun, S.-A., Oh, J. S., & Au, T. K.-F. (2003). Production benefits of childhood overhearing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1577560
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.