The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Perception and annoyance due to wind turbine noise—a dose–response relationship
Abstract
Installed global wind power increased by 26% during 2003, with U.S and Europe accounting for 90% of the cumulative capacity. Little is known about wind turbines’ impact on people living in their vicinity. The aims of this study were to evaluate the prevalence of annoyance due to wind turbine noise and to study dose–response relationships. Interrelationships between noise annoyance and sound characteristics, as well as the influence of subjective variables such as attitude and noise sensitivity, were also assessed. A cross-sectional study was performed in Sweden in 2000. Responses were obtained through questionnaires (n=351; response rate 68.4%), and doses were calculated as A-weighted sound pressure levels for each respondent. A statistically significant dose–response relationship was found, showing higher proportion of people reporting perception and annoyance than expected from the present dose–response relationships for transportation noise. The unexpected high proportion of annoyance could be due to visual interference, influencing noise annoyance, as well as the presence of intrusive sound characteristics. The respondents’ attitude to the visual impact of wind turbines on the landscape scenery was found to influence noise annoyance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination
NAGELKERKE, N. J. D. (1991) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/78.3.691 · Cited by 5,927
Cited by
Environmental issues associated with wind energy – A review
Dai, K., Bergot, A., Liang, C., Xiang, W.-N., & Huang, Z. (2015) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.074 · Cited by 473
Thirty years of North American wind energy acceptance research: What have we learned?
Rand, J., & Hoen, B. (2017) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.019 · Cited by 466
Full cost accounting for the life cycle of coal
Epstein, P. R., Buonocore, J. J., Eckerle, K., Hendryx, M., Stout III, B. M., Heinberg, R., Clapp, R. W., May, B., Reinhart, N. L., Ahern, M. M., et al. (2011) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05890.x · Cited by 330
Pedersen, E., & Persson Waye, K. (2007) · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1136/oem.2006.031039 · Cited by 326
Self-citationResponse to noise from modern wind farms in The Netherlands
Pedersen, E., van den Berg, F., Bakker, R., & Bouma, J. (2009) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.3160293 · Cited by 295
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pedersen, E., & Persson Waye, K.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 2004-12-01
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3460-3470
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2035967124
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perception and annoyance due to wind turbine noise—a dose–response relationship. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.1815091
- The paper
- Pedersen, E., & Persson Waye, K. (2004). Perception and annoyance due to wind turbine noise—a dose–response relationship. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1815091
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.