The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Response to noise from modern wind farms in The Netherlands
Open accessAbstract
The increasing number and size of wind farms call for more data on human response to wind turbine noise, so that a generalized dose-response relationship can be modeled and possible adverse health effects avoided. This paper reports the results of a 2007 field study in The Netherlands with 725 respondents. A dose-response relationship between calculated A-weighted sound pressure levels and reported perception and annoyance was found. Wind turbine noise was more annoying than transportation noise or industrial noise at comparable levels, possibly due to specific sound properties such as a “swishing” quality, temporal variability, and lack of nighttime abatement. High turbine visibility enhances negative response, and having wind turbines visible from the dwelling significantly increased the risk of annoyance. Annoyance was strongly correlated with a negative attitude toward the visual impact of wind turbines on the landscape. The study further demonstrates that people who benefit economically from wind turbines have a significantly decreased risk of annoyance, despite exposure to similar sound levels. Response to wind turbine noise was similar to that found in Sweden so the dose-response relationship should be generalizable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of environmental psychology
Stokols, D., & Altman, I. (1987) · Wiley eBooks · Cited by 2,990
Guidelines for community noise
Berglund, B., Lindvall, T., & Schwela, D. (1999) · Cited by 1,602
Noise pollution: non-auditory effects on health
Stansfeld, S. A., & Matheson, M. P. (2003) · British Medical Bulletin · doi:10.1093/bmb/ldg033 · Cited by 1,129
Crossmodal Processing in the Human Brain: Insights from Functional Neuroimaging Studies
Calvert, G. A. (2001) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/11.12.1110 · Cited by 1,012
Miedema, H. M., & Oudshoorn, C. G. (2001) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.01109409 · Cited by 899
Exposure-response relationships for transportation noise
Miedema, H., & Vos, H. (1998) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.423927 · Cited by 611
Human Behavior and Environment: Advances in Theory and Research Volume 2
(1977) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-0808-9 · Cited by 482
Perception and annoyance due to wind turbine noise—a dose–response relationship
Pedersen, E., & Persson Waye, K. (2004) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1815091 · Cited by 400
Self-citationPlace attachment in a developmental and cultural context
Giuliani, M. V., & Feldman, R. (1993) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80179-3 · Cited by 376
Pedersen, E., & Persson Waye, K. (2007) · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1136/oem.2006.031039 · Cited by 326
Self-citation
Cited by
Full cost accounting for the life cycle of coal
Epstein, P. R., Buonocore, J. J., Eckerle, K., Hendryx, M., Stout III, B. M., Heinberg, R., Clapp, R. W., May, B., Reinhart, N. L., Ahern, M. M., et al. (2011) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05890.x · Cited by 330
Smith, K. R., Frumkin, H., Balakrishnan, K., Butler, C. D., Chafe, Z. A., Fairlie, I., Kinney, P., Kjellstrom, T., Mauzerall, D. L., McKone, T. E., et al. (2013) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031912-114404 · Cited by 285
A review on recent advancements of substructures for offshore wind turbines
Wang, X., Zeng, X., Li, J., Yang, X., & Wang, H. (2018) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2017.12.061 · Cited by 258
Health effects and wind turbines: A review of the literature
Knopper, L. D., & Ollson, C. A. (2011) · Environmental Health · doi:10.1186/1476-069x-10-78 · Cited by 210
Wind Turbines and Human Health
Knopper, L. D., Ollson, C. A., McCallum, L. C., Whitfield Aslund, M. L., Berger, R. G., Souweine, K., & McDaniel, M. (2014) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2014.00063 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Pedersen, E., van den Berg, F., Bakker, R., & Bouma, J.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 2009-08-01
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 634-643
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2128037641
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 44.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Response to noise from modern wind farms in The Netherlands. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.3160293
- The paper
- Pedersen, E., van den Berg, F., Bakker, R., & Bouma, J. (2009). Response to noise from modern wind farms in The Netherlands. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3160293
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
