The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rate versus level functions for auditory-nerve fibers in cats: tone-burst stimuli
Abstract
Average discharge rate of single auditory-nerve fibers in cats was measured in response to 400-msec tone bursts. For each fiber, rate versus stimulus-level functions were constructed for a number of frequencies. For tones at a fiber's characteristic frequency (CF), rate increases rapidly over a range of 20 to 30 dB above threshold. For higher stimulus levels, a range of behaviors is observed. For some fibers, rate saturates completely at higher levels; i.e., there are no further systematic increases in rate when level is increased beyond about 30 dB above threshold. For other units there is a noticeable bend in the rate-level function at 20 to 30 dB above threshold; however, rate can continue to increase gradually over another 30 to 40 dB. For frequencies above fiber CF, the slope of rate-level functions measured near the midpoint between maximum and spontaneous rates is a decreasing function of frequency. For frequencies below CF, slope is either approximately constant and equal to the slope at CF or increases to some maximum value as frequency is decreased from the CF. These properties of rate-level functions are well accounted for by a simple model consisting of a mechanical stage followed by a saturating nonlinearity (transducer stage). The input (pressure) versus output (basilar membrane displacement} functions for the mechanical stage are taken directly from the measurements of Rhode. The input-output function for the transducer is developed empirically.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Neural Processing of Amplitude-Modulated Sounds
JORIS, P. X., SCHREINER, C. E., & REES, A. (2004) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00029.2003 · Cited by 938
Sensory neuron diversity in the inner ear is shaped by activity
Shrestha, B. R., Chia, C., Wu, L., Kujawa, S. G., Liberman, M. C., & Goodrich, L. V. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.007 · Cited by 432
Knipper, M., Van Dijk, P., Nunes, I., Rüttiger, L., & Zimmermann, U. (2013) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.08.002 · Cited by 309
Neural representation of spectral and temporal information in speech
Young, E. D. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2151 · Cited by 104
Comparing models of contrast gain using psychophysical experiments
DiMattina, C. (2016) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/16.9.1 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Sachs, M. B., & Abbas, P. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1974-12-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1835-1847
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2004543480
- Cited by
- 521
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rate versus level functions for auditory-nerve fibers in cats: tone-burst stimuli. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.1903521
- The paper
- Sachs, M. B., & Abbas, P. J. (1974). Rate versus level functions for auditory-nerve fibers in cats: tone-burst stimuli. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1903521
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.