The DOI matches its Crossref record; 221 of the 221 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advances in the neurobiology of hearing disorders: Recent developments regarding the basis of tinnitus and hyperacusis
Open accessAbstract
The prevalence of hearing problems in the Western world has, due to aging of the population, doubled over the past 30 years. Thereby, noise-induced hearing loss is an important factor that worsens over time in addition to age-related hearing loss. Hearing loss is usually measured as an elevation of a person's hearing thresholds, expressed in decibel (dB). However, recent animal studies have unraveled a type of permanent cochlear damage, without an elevation of hearing thresholds. This subtle damage is linked to a permanent and progressive degeneration of auditory fibers that occurs in association with damage of the inner hair cell synapse. Afferent neuronal degeneration has been suggested to be involved in hyperacusis (over sensitivity to sound) and tinnitus (a phantom sound percept). Hyperacusis and tinnitus are potentially devastating conditions that are still incurable. The main risk factors to develop tinnitus or hyperacusis are hearing loss, social stress and age. Both tinnitus and hyperacusis have been discussed in the context of a pathological increased response gain in subcortical brain regions as a reaction to deprivation of sensory input. Novel studies confirm the involvement of peripheral deafferentation for tinnitus and hyperacusis, but suggest that the disorder results from different brain responses to different degrees of deafferentation: while tinnitus may arise as a failure of the brain to adapt to deprived peripheral input, hyperacusis may result from an 'over-adaptive' increase in response gain. Moreover, moderate and high stress levels at the time of acoustic trauma have been suggested to play a pivotal role in the vulnerability of the cochlea to acoustic damage and therefore for the development of tinnitus and hyperacusis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Higgins, S. M. F., Macken, A. P., Cullen, W., Saunders, J., Dunne, C. P., & O’Gorman, C. S. (2013) · PubMed · doi:10.34961/9953 · Cited by 4,805
Adding Insult to Injury: Cochlear Nerve Degeneration after “Temporary” Noise-Induced Hearing Loss
Kujawa, S. G., & Liberman, M. C. (2009) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2845-09.2009 · Cited by 2,456
Drevets, W. C., Price, J. L., & Furey, M. L. (2008) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-008-0189-x · Cited by 2,241 · cited 2×
“The neural networks involved in normal emotional behavior that can be altered in mood disorders involve the medial prefrontal cortex, the medial and caudolateral orbital cortex (medial prefrontal network), anterior cingulate, amygdala, hippocampus, and ventromedial parts of the basal ganglia (Drevets et al., 2008; Hin…”
Current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey.
Ss, J. (1981) · PubMed · Cited by 1,866
Phantom auditory perception (tinnitus): mechanisms of generation and perception
Jastreboff, P. J. (1990) · Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1016/0168-0102(90)90031-9 · Cited by 1,576
Mechanics of the Mammalian Cochlea
Robles, L., & Ruggero, M. A. (2001) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.2001.81.3.1305 · Cited by 1,476
Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamber
Liberman, M. C. (1978) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.381736 · Cited by 1,203
Huang, Z. J., Kirkwood, A., Pizzorusso, T., Porciatti, V., Morales, B., Bear, M. F., Maffei, L., & Tonegawa, S. (1999) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81509-3 · Cited by 1,198
Schaette, R., & McAlpine, D. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2156-11.2011 · Cited by 1,009
Eggermont, J. J., & Roberts, L. E. (2004) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2004.08.010 · Cited by 991
Cited by
Tinnitus and anxiety disorders: a review
Pattyn, T., Van Den Eede, F., Vanneste, S., Cassiers, L., Veltman, D. J., Van De Heyning, P., & Sabbe, B. C. G. (2016) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2015.08.014 · Cited by 233
Fackrell, K., Potgieter, I., Shekhawat, G. S., Baguley, D. M., Sereda, M., & Hoare, D. J. (2017) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2017/2723715 · Cited by 93
“A consensus is emerging in the auditory neuroscience literature that hyperacusis may be associated with a sustained and persistent increase in central auditory gain [11].”
BackgroundHyperacusis: major research questions
Baguley, D. M., & Hoare, D. J. (2018) · HNO · doi:10.1007/s00106-017-0464-3 · Cited by 78
Deletion of Fmr1 alters function and synaptic inputs in the auditory brainstem
Rotschafer, S. E., Marshak, S., & Cramer, K. S. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117266 · Cited by 72
Wilson, U. S., Sadler, K. M., Hancock, K. E., Guinan, J. J., & Lichtenhan, J. T. (2017) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00142.2017 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Knipper, M., Van Dijk, P., Nunes, I., Rüttiger, L., & Zimmermann, U.
- Venue
- Progress in Neurobiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 111
- Pages
- 17-33
- ISSN
- 0301-0082 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2078098099
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 221
- FWCI
- 11.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advances in the neurobiology of hearing disorders: Recent developments regarding the basis of tinnitus and hyperacusis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.08.002
- The paper
- Knipper, M., Van Dijk, P., Nunes, I., Rüttiger, L., & Zimmermann, U. (2013). Advances in the neurobiology of hearing disorders: Recent developments regarding the basis of tinnitus and hyperacusis. Progress in Neurobiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.08.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
