The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of Differentiation, Integration, and Infinite Peak Clipping upon the Intelligibility of Speech
Abstract
Previous experiments on the effects of distortion in voice communication circuits have shown that intelligibility is impaired surprisingly little by the type of amplitude distortion known as peak clipping. It has been found, in fact, that conversation is possible even over a system that introduces “infinite” peak clipping, i.e., that reduces speech to a succession of rectangular waves in which the discontinuities correspond to the crossings of the time axis in the original speech signal. The intelligibility of the rectangular speech waves depends critically upon the frequency-response characteristics of the speech transmission circuits used in conjunction with the “infinite clipper.” In the present experiments, resistance-capacitance circuits with sloping frequency-response characteristics (tilting circuits) were introduced into the system at points preceding and/or following the clipping circuit. The interactions of the nonuniform frequency characteristics of the resistance-capacitance circuits with the nonlinear amplitude characteristic of the clipping circuit were studied by means of articulation tests. That there was strong interaction is evidenced by the fact that word articulation scores of 97 and 15 percent were obtained with two systems consisting of the same components in different orders. The components were (1) a tilter with a frequency-response characteristic rising 6 db per octave (a “differentiating” circuit), (2) an infinite peak clipper, and (3) a tilter with a frequency-response characteristic falling 6 db per octave (an “integrating” circuit). When these distorters were cascaded in the sequence 1-2-3 the speech output consisted of triangularly shaped waves which sounded very much like normal speech and which were highly intelligible (97 percent). When the reverse sequence (3-2-1) was used, the speech output consisted of sharp pulses giving rise to extremely poor quality and very low intelligibility (15 percent). Tests with single distorters and with pairs of distorters indicated that: (1) In the absence of frequency distortion, infinitely clipped speech is of poor quality but moderate intelligibility (50 to 90 percent depending on the listeners skill and familiarity with the test words). (2) A differentiator or an integrator preceding the clipper determines the degree to which intelligibility is impaired by infinite clipping. (3) A differentiator or an integrator following the clipper (or used alone in a linear system) affects the quality but not the intelligibility of the speech transmitted by the system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tonndorf, J. (1977) · Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology · doi:10.1177/00034894770860s601 · Cited by 319
Digital signal processing in studies of animal acoustical communication, including human speech
Davis, R. O. (1986) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/0169-2607(86)90050-7 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Licklider, J. C. R., & Pollack, I.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1948-01-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 42-51
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2022330547
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Differentiation, Integration, and Infinite Peak Clipping upon the Intelligibility of Speech. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.1906346
- The paper
- Licklider, J. C. R., & Pollack, I. (1948). Effects of Differentiation, Integration, and Infinite Peak Clipping upon the Intelligibility of Speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1906346
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.