The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Evolution of Human Hearing
Abstract
Five descriptive parameters of hearing—high-frequency and low-frequency sensitivity, lowest threshold. best frequency, and area of the audible field—are compared statistically, first, among mammals in general, and then, among seven animals selected to approximate a phylogenetic sequence of man's ancestors. Three potentially explanatory parameters body size, maximum binaural time disparity, and recency of common ancestry with man—are also explicitly included in the analysis. The results show that: high-frequency hearing (above 32 kHz) is a characteristic unique to mammals, and, among members of this class, one which is commonplace and primitive. Being highly correlated with functionally close-set ears, it is probably the result of selective pressure for accurate sound localization. Low-frequency hearing improved markedly in mankind's line of descent, but the kind and degree of improvement are not unique among mammalian lineages. High sensitivity developed in the earliest stages of man's lineage and has remained relatively unchanged since the simian level. The frequency of the lowest threshold has declined in Man's lineage—the greatest drop probably occurring during the Eocene. The total area of the audible field increased until the Eocene and has decreased since then.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Some quantitative properties of anxiety.
Estes, W. K., & Skinner, B. F. (1941) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0062283 · Cited by 1,349
Southern, H. N., & Walker, E. P. (1969) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/3059 · Cited by 731
Simpson, G. G. (1949) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 557
Marler, P. (1967) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.157.3790.769 · Cited by 275
Borror, D. J. (1964) · Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America · doi:10.1093/besa/10.3.203b · Cited by 242
Colbert, E. H. (1951) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1951.tb02803.x · Cited by 231
Major Steps in Vertebrate Evolution
Romer, A. S. (1967) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.158.3809.1629 · Cited by 164
Dalland, J. I. (1965) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.150.3700.1185 · Cited by 98
Visual and Nonvisual Auditory Systems in Mammals
Harrison, J. M., & Irving, R. E. (1966) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.154.3750.738 · Cited by 93
Kellogg, W. N. (1961) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · Cited by 90
Cited by
The Comparative Analysis of Learning: Are the laws of learning the same in all animals?
Bitterman, M. E. (1975) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.188.4189.699 · Cited by 492
Klump, G. M., & Shalter, M. D. (1984) · Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1984.tb01365.x · Cited by 378
Hearing range of the domestic cat
Heffner, R. S., & Heffner, H. E. (1985) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/0378-5955(85)90100-5 · Cited by 179
Self-citationHearing in large and small dogs: Absolute thresholds and size of the tympanic membrane.
Heffner, H. E. (1983) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.97.2.310 · Cited by 104
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Masterton, B., Heffner, H., & Ravizza, R.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1969-04-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 966-985
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2037659240
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 8.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Evolution of Human Hearing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.1911574
- The paper
- Masterton, B., Heffner, H., & Ravizza, R. (1969). The Evolution of Human Hearing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1911574
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.