CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 90

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of age on detection of gaps in speech and nonspeech markers varying in duration and spectral symmetry.

Pichora-Fuller, M. Kathleen, Schneider, Bruce A., Benson, Nancy J., Hamstra, Stanley J., Storzer, Edward·2006·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
DOI 10.1121/1.2149837
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Gap detection thresholds for speech and analogous nonspeech stimuli were determined in younger and older adults with clinically normal hearing in the speech range. Gap detection thresholds were larger for older than for younger listeners in all conditions, with the size of the age difference increasing with stimulus complexity. For both ages, gap detection thresholds were far smaller when the markers before and after the gap were the same (spectrally symmetrical) compared to when they were different (spectrally asymmetrical) for both speech and nonspeech stimuli. Moreover, gap detection thresholds were smaller for nonspeech than for speech stimuli when the markers were spectrally symmetrical but the opposite was observed when the markers were spectrally asymmetrical. This pattern of results may reflect the benefit of activating well-learned gap-dependent phonemic contrasts. The stimulus-dependent age effects were interpreted as reflecting the differential effects of age-dependent losses in temporal processing ability on within- and between-channel gap detection.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1121/1.2149837

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. 1980, Aging and Speech Perception
  2. 1999, Azimuthal tuning of human perceptual channels for sound location, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 106, 1948, 10.1121/1.428037 · DOI
  3. 1997, Hemispheric asymmetries for the temporal resolution of brief auditory stimuli, Percept. Psychophys., 59, 442, 10.3758/BF03211910 · DOI
  4. CHABA (Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics, and Biomechanics), 1988, Speech understanding and aging, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 83, 859, 10.1121/1.395965 · DOI
  5. 1998, Within-channel gap detection using dissimilar markers in cochlear implant listeners, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 103, 2515, 10.1121/1.422772 · DOI
  6. 1999, Hearing in aging: Issues old and young, Otolaryngol.-Head Neck Surg., 7, 282
  7. 1992, The detection of temporal gaps as a function of frequency region and absolute noise bandwidth, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 91, 1069, 10.1121/1.402633 · DOI
  8. 2000, Neural responses in primary auditory cortex mimic psychophysical, across-frequency-channel, gap detection thresholds, J. Neurophysiol., 84, 1453, 10.1152/jn.2000.84.3.1453 · DOI
  9. 1984, Temporal gap detection in sensorineural and simulated hearing impairments, J. Speech Hear. Res., 27, 449, 10.1044/jshr.2703.449 · DOI
  10. 1993, Detection of silent temporal gaps between narrow-band noise markers having second-formant-like properties of voiceless stop∕vowel combinations, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 93, 1023, 10.1121/1.405550 · DOI
  11. 1991, Detection of silent temporal gaps in sinusoidal markers, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 89, 830, 10.1121/1.1894643 · DOI
  12. 1998, Evidence for an across-frequency, between-channel process in asymptotic monaural gap detection, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 103, 3554, 10.1121/1.423084 · DOI
  13. 1989, Effects of randomizing signal level and duration on temporal gap detection, Audiology, 28, 250, 10.3109/00206098909081630 · DOI
  14. 1996, An asymmetric roex filter model for describing detection of silent temporal gaps in sinusoidal markers, Aud. Neurosci., 3, 1
  15. 1998, Temporal gap detection measured with multiple sinusoidal markers: Effects of marker number, frequency, and temporal position, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 104, 984, 10.1121/1.423313 · DOI
  16. 1996, Detection of silent temporal gaps in sinusoidal markers simulated with a single-channel envelope detector model, Aud. Neurosci., 3, 21
  17. 1997, Speech recognition in noise and presbycusis: Relations to possible neural sites, Hear. Res., 106, 95, 10.1016/S0378-5955(97)00006-3 · DOI
  18. 2004, Effects of stimulus and noise rate variability on speech perception by younger and older adults, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 115, 1808, 10.1121/1.1645249 · DOI
  19. 1993, Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners, J. Speech Hear. Res., 36, 1276, 10.1044/jshr.3606.1276 · DOI
  20. 1991, Gap detection in multiple narrow bands of noise as a function of spectral configuration, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 90, 3061, 10.1121/1.401780 · DOI
  21. 1989, Gap detection as a function of stimulus bandwidth with fixed high-frequency cutoff in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 86, 1747, 10.1121/1.398606 · DOI
  22. 1993, Gap detection in a narrow band of noise in the presence of a flanking band of noise, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 93, 1645, 10.1121/1.406825 · DOI
  23. 2001, Gap duration in listeners with cochlear hearing loss: Effects of gap and marker duration, frequency separation, and mode of presentation, J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol., 2, 388, 10.1007/s101620010067 · DOI
  24. 2001, Gap detection for similar and dissimilar gap markers, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 109, 1587, 10.1121/1.1354983 · DOI
  25. 1996, Gap detection for pairs of noise bands: Effects of stimulus level and frequency separation, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 99, 1091, 10.1121/1.414595 · DOI
  26. 1999, The perception of spoken language by elderly listeners: Contributions of auditory temporal processes, Can. Acoust., 27, 96
  27. 1999, Psychometric functions for gap detection in noise measured from young and aged subjects, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 106, 966, 10.1121/1.427109 · DOI
  28. 1996, Temporal gap detection thresholds in sinusoidal markers simulated with a multichannel, multiresolution model of the auditory periphery, Aud. Neurosci., 3, 35
  29. 1971, Transformed up-down methods in psychacoustics, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 49, 467, 10.1121/1.1912375 · DOI
  30. 2002, Effects of age and frequency disparity on gap discrimination, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 111, 2793, 10.1121/1.1476685 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 2000, Binaural gap duration discrimination in listeners with impaired hearing and normal hearing, Ear Hear., 21, 141, 10.1097/00003446-200004000-00008 · DOI
  32. 2004, Effect of age on silent gap discrimination in synthetic speech stimuli, J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res., 47, 257, 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/021) · DOI
  33. 1988, Gap detection with sinusoids and noise in normal, impaired, and electrically stimulated ears, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 83, 1093, 10.1121/1.396054 · DOI
  34. 1993, Detection of temporal gaps in sinusoids: Effects of frequency and level, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 93, 1563, 10.1121/1.406815 · DOI
  35. 1995, Say-stay” identification and psychoacoustic performance of hearing-impaired listeners, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 97, 1830, 10.1121/1.412057 · DOI
  36. 2001, Age differences for stop-consonant and vowel perception in adults, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 110, 2156, 10.1121/1.1399047 · DOI
  37. 2000, Influence of spatial and temporal coding on auditory gap detection, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 107, 2215, 10.1121/1.428502 · DOI
  38. 2000, Independence of frequency channels in auditory temporal gap detection, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 108, 2957, 10.1121/1.1320473 · DOI
  39. 2002, Auditory temporal gap detection for noise markers with partially overlapping and nonoverlapping spectra, Hear. Res., 174, 133, 10.1016/S0378-5955(02)00647-0 · DOI
  40. 1998, ‘Central’ auditory gap detection: A spatial case, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 103, 2064, 10.1121/1.421353 · DOI
  41. 1997, Detection of silent intervals between noises activating different perceptual channels: Some properties of ‘central’ auditory gap detection, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 101, 3694, 10.1121/1.419376 · DOI
  42. 2003, Effects of aging on auditory processing of speech, International Journal of Audiology, 42, S11, 10.3109/14992020309074638 · DOI
  43. 1984, Perception of temporal differences in speech by ‘normal-hearing’ adults: Effects of age and intensity, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 76, 405, 10.1121/1.391581 · DOI
  44. 2003, Hemispheric asymmetries for gap detection depend on noise type, Brain Cogn, 53, 372, 10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00146-5 · DOI
  45. 1999, Gap detection thresholds as a function of tonal duration for younger and older listeners, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 106, 371, 10.1121/1.427062 · DOI
  46. Craik, 2000, Implications of perceptual processing for cognitive aging research
  47. 2001, Age-related changes in temporal processing: Implications for listening comprehension, Semin. Hear., 22, 227, 10.1055/s-2001-15628 · DOI
  48. 1998, Age-related changes in temporal resolution: Envelope and intensity effects, Can. J. Exp. Psychol., 52, 184, 10.1037/h0087291 · DOI
  49. 1994, Gap detection and the precedence effect in young and old adults, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 95, 980, 10.1121/1.408403 · DOI
  50. 1987, Gap detection and the auditory filter: Phase effects using sinusoidal stimuli, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 81, 1110, 10.1121/1.394631 · DOI
  51. 1997, Age-related changes in temporal gap detection, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 101, 2214, 10.1121/1.418205 · DOI
  52. 2000, Relationships among age-related differences in gap detection and word recognition, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 107, 1615, 10.1121/1.428446 · DOI
  53. 2002, Word recognition in competing babble and the effects of age, temporal processing, and absolute sensitivity, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 112, 720, 10.1121/1.1487841 · DOI
  54. 1998, Temporal processing in the aging auditory system, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 104, 2385, 10.1121/1.423748 · DOI
  55. 1999, Additivity of perceptual channel-crossing effects in auditory gap detection, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 105, 563, 10.1121/1.424593 · DOI
  56. 1982, Psychoacoustic and phonetic temporal processing in normal and hearing-impaired listeners, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 72, 740, 10.1121/1.388254 · DOI
  57. 1999, Gap detection in single- and multiple-channel stimuli by LAURA cochlear implantees, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 106, 1925, 10.1121/1.427941 · DOI
  58. Yost, 1993, Time analysis, 10.1007/978-1-4612-2728-1 · DOI
  59. 1998, Age-related alteration in processing of temporal sound features in the auditory midbrain of the CBA mouse, J. Neurosci., 18, 2764, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-07-02764.1998 · DOI
  60. 2001, Human auditory brainstem response to temporal gaps in noise, J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res., 44, 737, 10.1044/1092-4388(2001/058) · DOI
  61. 1996, Cognitive factors in auditory performance: Context, speed of processing, and constraints of memory, J. Am. Acad. Audiol, 7, 175

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Schneider, B. A., Benson, N. J., Hamstra, S. J., & Storzer, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto Department of Psychology, , 3359 Mississauga Road N, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5L 1C6
  • The Hospital for Sick Children , 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X8
  • University of Toronto Department of Surgery, , 100 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1L5
  • McNeill Audiology , 116-2187 Oak Bay Avenue, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada V8R 1G1
Venue
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Publisher
Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
Published
2006-02-01
Volume
119
Issue
2
Pages
1143-1155
ISSN
  • 0001-4966
  • 1520-8524
DOI
10.1121/1.2149837
Cited by
90
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review