Cited by 335Phonetics and Phonology ResearchCategorization, perception, and languageNeuroscience and Music Perception

Cue weighting in auditory categorization: Implications for first and second language acquisition

Open access
Holt, Lori L., Lotto, Andrew J.·2006·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Abstract

The ability to integrate and weight information across dimensions is central to perception and is particularly important for speech categorization. The present experiments investigate cue weighting by training participants to categorize sounds drawn from a two-dimensional acoustic space defined by the center frequency (CF) and modulation frequency (MF) of frequency-modulated sine waves. These dimensions were psychophysically matched to be equally discriminable and, in the first experiment, were equally informative for accurate categorization. Nevertheless, listeners’ category responses reflected a bias for use of CF. This bias remained even when the informativeness of CF was decreased by shifting distributions to create more overlap in CF. A reversal of weighting (MF over CF) was obtained when distribution variance was increased for CF. These results demonstrate that even when equally informative and discriminable, acoustic cues are not necessarily equally weighted in categorization; listeners exhibit biases when integrating multiple acoustic dimensions. Moreover, changes in weighting strategies can be affected by changes in input distribution parameters. This methodology provides potential insights into acquisition of speech sound categories, particularly second language categories. One implication is that ineffective cue weighting strategies for phonetic categories may be alleviated by manipulating variance of uninformative dimensions in training stimuli.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1121/1.2188377

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holt, L. L., & Lotto, A. J.
Affiliations
  • Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2006-05-01
Volume
119
Issue
5
Pages
3059-3071
ISSN
  • 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-8524
OpenAlex
W2047509453
Cited by
335
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 12
FWCI
9.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KiltHub Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • KiltHub Repository
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0078768)
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
cue weighting, auditory categorization, center frequency, modulation frequency, second language acquisition, first language acquisition, phonetic categories, perceptual learning
MeSH terms
Cues, Female, Humans, Language Development, Male, Speech Acoustics, Speech Discrimination Tests, Speech Perception, Multilingualism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review