Cue weighting in auditory categorization: Implications for first and second language acquisition
Open accessAbstract
The ability to integrate and weight information across dimensions is central to perception and is particularly important for speech categorization. The present experiments investigate cue weighting by training participants to categorize sounds drawn from a two-dimensional acoustic space defined by the center frequency (CF) and modulation frequency (MF) of frequency-modulated sine waves. These dimensions were psychophysically matched to be equally discriminable and, in the first experiment, were equally informative for accurate categorization. Nevertheless, listeners’ category responses reflected a bias for use of CF. This bias remained even when the informativeness of CF was decreased by shifting distributions to create more overlap in CF. A reversal of weighting (MF over CF) was obtained when distribution variance was increased for CF. These results demonstrate that even when equally informative and discriminable, acoustic cues are not necessarily equally weighted in categorization; listeners exhibit biases when integrating multiple acoustic dimensions. Moreover, changes in weighting strategies can be affected by changes in input distribution parameters. This methodology provides potential insights into acquisition of speech sound categories, particularly second language categories. One implication is that ineffective cue weighting strategies for phonetic categories may be alleviated by manipulating variance of uninformative dimensions in training stimuli.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/s0163-6383(84)80022-3 · Cited by 2,801 · see citing works
Kuhl, P. K. (1991) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03212211 · Cited by 1,331 · see citing works
Speech Perception by the Chinchilla: Voiced-Voiceless Distinction in Alveolar Plosive Consonants
Kuhl, P. K., & Miller, J. D. (1975) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1166301 · Cited by 691 · see citing works
Categorization of speech by infants: Support for speech-sound prototypes.
Grieser, D., & Kuhl, P. K. (1989) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.25.4.577 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Statistical phonetic learning in infants: facilitation and feature generalization
Maye, J., Weiss, D. J., & Aslin, R. N. (2008) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00653.x · Cited by 376 · see citing works
The extraction and integration framework: A two-process account of statistical learning
Thiessen, E. D., Kronstein, A. T., & Hufnagle, D. G. (2013) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0030801 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
- Authors
- Holt, L. L., & Lotto, A. J.
- Affiliations
- Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition (US)
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- ORCID
- Holt, Lori L.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 2006-05-01
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3059-3071
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2047509453
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 9.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- KiltHub Repository (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- KiltHub Repository
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0078768)
- James S. McDonnell Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Keywords
- cue weighting, auditory categorization, center frequency, modulation frequency, second language acquisition, first language acquisition, phonetic categories, perceptual learning
- MeSH terms
- Cues, Female, Humans, Language Development, Male, Speech Acoustics, Speech Discrimination Tests, Speech Perception, Multilingualism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review