Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,144

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An audio-visual corpus for speech perception and automatic speech recognition

Cooke, Martin, Barker, Jon, Cunningham, Stuart, Shao, Xu·2006·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Abstract

An audio-visual corpus has been collected to support the use of common material in speech perception and automatic speech recognition studies. The corpus consists of high-quality audio and video recordings of 1000 sentences spoken by each of 34 talkers. Sentences are simple, syntactically identical phrases such as “place green at B 4 now.” Intelligibility tests using the audio signals suggest that the material is easily identifiable in quiet and low levels of stationary noise. The annotated corpus is available on the web for research use.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1121/1.2229005

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. 1994, Recognition of plosive syllables in noise: Comparison of an auditory model with human performance, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 96, 687, 10.1121/1.410306 · doi:10.1121/1.410306
  2. 2000, A speech corpus for multitalker communications research, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 107, 1065, 10.1121/1.428288 · DOI
  3. 2001, Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 100, 2527, 10.1121/1.1408946 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 2006, A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 119, 1562, 10.1121/1.2166600 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 1947, Factors governing the intelligibility of speech sounds, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 19, 90, 10.1121/1.1916407 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 1993, Adequacy of auditory models to predict human internal representation of speech sounds, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 93, 2160, 10.1121/1.406679 · doi:10.1121/1.406679
  7. 1996, Speech intelligibility prediction in hearing-impaired listeners based on a psychoacoustically motivated perception model, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 100, 1703, 10.1121/1.417354 · DOI
  8. 1981, Voice communication jamming research, 2
  9. 2003, Recent advances in the automatic recognition of audiovisual speech, Proc. IEEE, 91, 1306, 10.1109/JPROC.2003.817150 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 2002, The perceptual basis for audiovisual integration, 1461
  11. 1980, A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 67, 318, 10.1121/1.384464 · doi:10.1121/1.384464
  12. 1999, The HTK Book 2.2

Cited by

See all 1,144

Metadata

Authors
Cooke, M., Barker, J., Cunningham, S., & Shao, X.
Venue
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2006-11-01
Volume
120
Issue
5
Pages
2421-2424
ISSN
  • 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-8524
OpenAlex
W2015143272
Cited by
1,144
References
1
FWCI
25.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An audio-visual corpus for speech perception and automatic speech recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.2229005
The paper
Cooke, M., Barker, J., Cunningham, S., & Shao, X. (2006). An audio-visual corpus for speech perception and automatic speech recognition. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2229005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.