The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Direct observations of ultrasound microbubble contrast agent interaction with the microvessel wall
Abstract
Many thousands of contrast ultrasound studies have been conducted in clinics around the world. In addition, the microbubbles employed in these examinations are being widely investigated to deliver drugs and genes. Here, for the first time, the oscillation of these microbubbles in small vessels is directly observed and shown to be substantially different than that predicted by previous models and imaged within large fluid volumes. Using pulsed ultrasound with a center frequency of 1MHz and peak rarefactional pressure of 0.8 or 2.0MPa, microbubble expansion was significantly reduced when microbubbles were constrained within small vessels in the rat cecum (p<0.05). A model for microbubble oscillation within compliant vessels is presented that accurately predicts oscillation and vessel displacement within small vessels. As a result of the decreased oscillation in small vessels, a large resting microbubble diameter resulting from agent fusion or a high mechanical index was required to bring the agent shell into contact with the endothelium. Also, contact with the endothelium was observed during asymmetrical collapse, not during expansion. These results will be used to improve the design of drug delivery techniques using microbubbles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The dynamics of the piezo inkjet printhead operation☆
Wijshoff, H. (2010) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010.03.003 · Cited by 593
Scanning ultrasound removes amyloid-β and restores memory in an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model
Leinenga, G., & Götz, J. (2015) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa2512 · Cited by 498
Acoustic behavior of microbubbles and implications for drug delivery
Kooiman, K., Vos, H. J., Versluis, M., & de Jong, N. (2014) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2014.03.003 · Cited by 401
Blood Vessel Deformations on Microsecond Time Scales by Ultrasonic Cavitation
Chen, H., Kreider, W., Brayman, A. A., Bailey, M. R., & Matula, T. J. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.034301 · Cited by 314
Ultrasound targeted CNS gene delivery for Parkinson's disease treatment
Fan, C.-H., Lin, C.-Y., Liu, H.-L., & Yeh, C.-K. (2017) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.07.004 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Caskey, C. F., Stieger, S. M., Qin, S., Dayton, P. A., & Ferrara, K. W.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 2007-08-01
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1191-1200
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2036805197
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direct observations of ultrasound microbubble contrast agent interaction with the microvessel wall. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.2747204
- The paper
- Caskey, C. F., Stieger, S. M., Qin, S., Dayton, P. A., & Ferrara, K. W. (2007). Direct observations of ultrasound microbubble contrast agent interaction with the microvessel wall. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2747204
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.