The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis
Abstract
Detectability of a 400-ms, 1000-Hz pure-tone signal was examined in bandlimited noise where different spectral regions were given similar waveform envelope characteristics. As expected, in random noise the threshold increased as the noise bandwidth was increased up to a critical bandwidth, but remained constant for further increases in bandwidth. In the noise with envelope coherence however, threshold decreased when the noise bandwidth was made wider than the critical bandwidth. The improvement in detectability was attributed to a process by which energy outside the critical band is used to help differentiate signal from masking noise, provided that the waveform envelope characteristics of the noise inside and outside the critical band are similar. With flanking coherent noise bands either lower or higher in frequency than a noise band centered on the signal, it was next determined that the frequency relation and remoteness of the coherent noise did not particularly influence the magnitude of the unmasking effect. An interpretation in terms of nonsimultaneous masking was reconciled with some aspects of the data, and with an interpretation in terms of across-frequency temporal pattern analysis. This paradigm, in which detection is based upon across-frequency temporal envelope coherence, was termed ‘‘comodulation masking release.’’ Comodulation offers a controlled way to investigate some of the mechanisms which permit signals to be detected at adverse signal-to-noise ratios.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Neural Processing of Amplitude-Modulated Sounds
JORIS, P. X., SCHREINER, C. E., & REES, A. (2004) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00029.2003 · Cited by 938
Complex Sounds and Auditory Images
Patterson, R. D., Robinson, K., Holdsworth, J., McKeown, D., Zhang, C., & Allerhand, M. (1992) · Auditory Physiology and Perception · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-041847-6.50054-x · Cited by 444
Bee, M. A., & Micheyl, C. (2008) · Journal of Comparative Psychology · doi:10.1037/0735-7036.122.3.235 · Cited by 347
Metadata
- Authors
- Hall, J. W., Haggard, M. P., & Fernandes, M. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1984-07-01
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 50-56
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2087596342
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.391005
- The paper
- Hall, J. W., Haggard, M. P., & Fernandes, M. A. (1984). Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.391005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.