The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels
Abstract
A quantitative perceptual model of human vowel recognition based upon psychoacoustic and speech perception data is described. At an intermediate auditory stage of processing, the specific bark difference level of the model represents the pattern of peripheral auditory excitation as the distance in critical bands (barks) between neighboring formants and between the fundamental frequency (F0) and first formant (F1). At a higher, phonetic stage of processing, represented by the critical bark difference level of the model, the transformed vowels may be dichotomously classified based on whether the difference between formants in each dimension falls within or exceeds the critical distance of 3 bark for the spectral center of gravity effect [Chistovich et al., Hear. Res. 1, 185–195 (1979)]. Vowel transformations and classifications correspond well to several major phonetic dimensions and features by which vowels are perceived and traditionally classified. The F1–F0 dimension represents vowel height, and high vowels have F1–F0 differences within 3 bark. The F3–F2 dimension corresponds to vowel place of articulation, and front vowels have F3–F2 differences of less than 3 bark. As an inherent, speaker-independent normalization procedure, the model provides excellent vowel clustering while it greatly reduces between-speaker variability. It offers robust normalization through feature classification because gross binary categorization allows for considerable acoustic variability. There was generally less formant and bark-difference variability for closely spaced formants than for widely spaced formants. These findings agree with independently observed perceptual results and support Stevens’ quantal theory of vowel production and perceptual constraints on production predicted from the critical bark difference level of the model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access.
Goldinger, S. D. (1998) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.105.2.251 · Cited by 1,587
Phonetic Feature Encoding in Human Superior Temporal Gyrus
Mesgarani, N., Cheung, C., Johnson, K., & Chang, E. F. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1245994 · Cited by 993
Effects of experience on non-native speakers' production and perception of English vowels
Flege, J. E., Bohn, O.-S., & Jang, S. (1997) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1006/jpho.1997.0052 · Cited by 890
Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features
Stevens, K. N. (2002) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1458026 · Cited by 597
Infant vocalizations in response to speech: vocal imitation and developmental change
Kuhl, P. K., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1996) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.417951 · Cited by 560
Metadata
- Authors
- Syrdal, A. K., & Gopal, H. S.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1986-04-01
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1086-1100
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2092170886
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.393381
- The paper
- Syrdal, A. K., & Gopal, H. S. (1986). A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.393381
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.