The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech intelligibility in noise
Abstract
A study was made of the effect of interaural time delay (ITD) and acoustic headshadow on binaural speech intelligibility in noise. A free-field condition was simulated by presenting recordings, made with a KEMAR manikin in an anechoic room, through earphones. Recordings were made of speech, reproduced in front of the manikin, and of noise, emanating from seven angles in the azimuthal plane, ranging from 0° (frontal) to 180° in steps of 30°. From this noise, two signals were derived, one containing only ITD, the other containing only interaural level differences (ILD) due to headshadow. Using this material, speech reception thresholds (SRT) for sentences in noise were determined for a group of normal-hearing subjects. Results show that (1) for noise azimuths between 30° and 150°, the gain due to ITD lies between 3.9 and 5.1 dB, while the gain due to ILD ranges from 3.5 to 7.8 dB, and (2) ILD decreases the effectiveness of binaural unmasking due to ITD (on the average, the threshold shift drops from 4.6 to 2.6 dB). In a second experiment, also conducted with normal-hearing subjects, similar stimuli were used, but now presented monaurally or with an overall 20-dB attenuation in one channel, in order to simulate hearing loss. In addition, SRTs were determined for noise with fixed ITDs, for comparison with the results obtained with head-induced (frequency dependent) ITDs. Results show that (1) for noise with only ILD, the gain relies on the ear presented with the most favorable signal-to-noise ratio, but decreases when the noise presented to the other ear becomes relatively loud; (2) the effect of ITD is fairly insensitive to a 20-dB attenuation of either channel, also when ITD is introduced in noise with ILD; and (3) the unmasking caused by a head-induced ITD can be predicted from the delay for low frequencies (250–500 Hz).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
3-D sound for virtual reality and multimedia
Madole, D., & Begault, D. (1995) · Computer Music Journal · doi:10.2307/3680997 · Cited by 868
The benefit of binaural hearing in a cocktail party: Effect of location and type of interferer
Hawley, M. L., Litovsky, R. Y., & Culling, J. F. (2004) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1639908 · Cited by 538
Vermeire, K., & Van de Heyning, P. (2009) · Audiology and Neurotology · doi:10.1159/000171478 · Cited by 337
Grossberg, S. (2017) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2016.11.003 · Cited by 120
Application of a Three-Dimensional Auditory Display in a Flight Task
Bronkhorst, A. W., Veltman, J. A. (., & Van Breda, L. (1996) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872096778940859 · Cited by 100
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bronkhorst, A. W., & Plomp, R.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1988-04-01
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1508-1516
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2030547026
- Cited by
- 513
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech intelligibility in noise. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.395906
- The paper
- Bronkhorst, A. W., & Plomp, R. (1988). The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech intelligibility in noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.395906
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.