The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Declination ‘‘reset’’ and the hierarchical organization of utterances
Abstract
Sequences of accented fundamental frequency (F0) peaks (‘‘toplines’’) were measured for sentences of the form A and B but C and A but B and C, where A, B, and C are separate main clauses with three (four in a replication experiment) accented words each. It was hypothesized that the differences in boundary strength (but-boundary stronger than and ) would be reflected in the way declination was reset following the boundaries. There were significant differences between the toplines of the two sentence types, the most consistent being that the accent peaks immediately following the two boundaries were higher if they followed but than if they followed and . In other respects the toplines were similar, exhibiting declination within each clause and across the three clauses; corresponding clause toplines that began at different levels following different boundaries nevertheless tended to end at the same level. The fact that hierarchical organization is reflected intonationally in this way makes problems for models of F0 in which contours result from the interaction of a number of preplanned overall trends. Suggestions are made for the incorporation of hierarchical information into models that analyze F0 contours as strings of abstract targets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review
Wagner, M., & Watson, D. G. (2010) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690961003589492 · Cited by 425
Contrastive focus vs. discourse-new: Evidence from phonetic prominence in English
Katz, J., & Selkirk, E. (2011) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.2011.0076 · Cited by 326
Barnes, J., Veilleux, N., Brugos, A., & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2012) · Laboratory Phonology · doi:10.1515/lp-2012-0017 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Ladd, D. R.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1988-08-01
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 530-544
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2057007972
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Declination ‘‘reset’’ and the hierarchical organization of utterances. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.396830
- The paper
- Ladd, D. R. (1988). Declination ‘‘reset’’ and the hierarchical organization of utterances. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.396830
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.