The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A cochlear frequency-position function for several species—29 years later
Abstract
Accurate cochlear frequency-position functions based on physiological data would facilitate the interpretation of physiological and psychoacoustic data within and across species. Such functions might aid in developing cochlear models, and cochlear coordinates could provide potentially useful spectral transforms of speech and other acoustic signals. In 1961, an almost-exponential function was developed (Greenwood, 1961b, 1974) by integrating an exponential function fitted to a subset of frequency resolution-integration estimates (critical bandwidths). The resulting frequency-position function was found to fit cochlear observations on human cadaver ears quite well and, with changes of constants, those on elephant, cow, guinea pig, rat, mouse, and chicken (Békésy, 1960), as well as in vivo (behavioral–anatomical) data on cats (Schucknecht, 1953). Since 1961, new mechanical and other physiological data have appeared on the human, cat, guinea pig, chinchilla, monkey, and gerbil. It is shown here that the newer extended data on human cadaver ears and from living animal preparations are quite well fit by the same basic function. The function essentially requires only empirical adjustment of a single parameter to set an upper frequency limit, while a ‘‘slope’’ parameter can be left constant if cochlear partition length is normalized to 1 or scaled if distance is specified in physical units. Constancy of slope and form in dead and living ears and across species increases the probability that the function fitting human cadaver data may apply as well to the living human ear. This prospect increases the function’s value in plotting auditory data and in modeling concerned with speech and other bioacoustic signals, since it fits the available physiological data well and, consequently (if those data are correct), remains independent of, and an appropriate means to examine, psychoacoustic data and assumptions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Friesen, L. M., Shannon, R. V., Baskent, D., & Wang, X. (2001) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1381538 · Cited by 1,049
Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception
Smith, Z. M., Delgutte, B., & Oxenham, A. J. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/416087a · Cited by 873
Davis, M. H., Johnsrude, I. S., Hervais-Adelman, A., Taylor, K., & McGettigan, C. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.2.222 · Cited by 531
Complex Sounds and Auditory Images
Patterson, R. D., Robinson, K., Holdsworth, J., McKeown, D., Zhang, C., & Allerhand, M. (1992) · Auditory Physiology and Perception · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-041847-6.50054-x · Cited by 444
Frequency Map for the Human Cochlear Spiral Ganglion: Implications for Cochlear Implants
Stakhovskaya, O., Sridhar, D., Bonham, B. H., & Leake, P. A. (2007) · Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology · doi:10.1007/s10162-007-0076-9 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Greenwood, D. D.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1990-06-01
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2592-2605
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2037976268
- Cited by
- 1,890
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A cochlear frequency-position function for several species—29 years later. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.399052
- The paper
- Greenwood, D. D. (1990). A cochlear frequency-position function for several species—29 years later. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.399052
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.