The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Age changes in pure-tone hearing thresholds in a longitudinal study of normal human aging
Abstract
Hearing thresholds were obtained on 813 adult males (20–95 years) measured at 11 frequencies ranging from 0.125–8 kHz from pure-tone audiograms collected over a 20-year period from 1968 to 1987. Audiograms taken at two to six different ages spanning a maximum observation period of 15 years were obtained for each male belonging to one of seven different age groups (20,30,...,80 years) based on the age of initial observation. The males were participants in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA), a multidisciplinary community-based study of nomal human aging. Changes in hearing thresholds occurred in all age groups during the 15-year follow-up period. For example, at 0.5 and 8 kHz for combined left and right ears there was an average longitudinal loss of 5.7–7.6 and 5.1–21.1 dB, respectively, for 20-year-olds, 10.0–12.7 and 35.2–53.0 dB for 50-year-olds, and 22.9–48.5 and 69.0–84.5 dB for 80-year-olds. As in results from previous cross-sectional studies, hearing loss in the males 70 years and older is greatest at the highest frequencies. The rate of change for these older males is faster in the speech-range frequencies 0.5–2 kHz than in the higher frequencies, since their hearing has already diminished at the high frequencies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bowl, M. R., & Dawson, S. J. (2019) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a033217 · Cited by 396
The analysis of multivariate longitudinal data: A review
Verbeke, G., Fieuws, S., Molenberghs, G., & Davidian, M. (2014) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0962280212445834 · Cited by 290
Bonneville-Roussy, A., Rentfrow, P. J., Xu, M. K., & Potter, J. (2013) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0033770 · Cited by 292
Anstey, K. J., Luszcz, M. A., & Sanchez, L. (2001) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/56.1.p3 · Cited by 134
Ter Haar, G., Venker-van Haagen, A. J., Van Den Brom, W. E., Van Sluijs, F. J., & Smoorenburg, G. F. (2008) · Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1939-1676.2008.0126.x · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Brant, L. J., & Fozard, J. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1990-08-01
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 813-820
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2015668929
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Age changes in pure-tone hearing thresholds in a longitudinal study of normal human aging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.399731
- The paper
- Brant, L. J., & Fozard, J. L. (1990). Age changes in pure-tone hearing thresholds in a longitudinal study of normal human aging. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.399731
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.