The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vocal quality factors: Analysis, synthesis, and perception
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine several factors of vocal quality that might be affected by changes in vocal fold vibratory patterns. Four voice types were examined: modal, vocal fry, falsetto, and breathy. Three categories of analysis techniques were developed to extract source-related features from speech and electroglottographic (EGG) signals. Four factors were found to be important for characterizing the glottal excitations for the four voice types: the glottal pulse width, the glottal pulse skewness, the abruptness of glottal closure, and the turbulent noise component. The significance of these factors for voice synthesis was studied and a new voice source model that accounted for certain physiological aspects of vocal fold motion was developed and tested using speech synthesis. Perceptual listening tests were conducted to evaluate the auditory effects of the source model parameters upon synthesized speech. The effects of the spectral slope of the source excitation, the shape of the glottal excitation pulse, and the characteristics of the turbulent noise source were considered. Applications for these research results include synthesis of natural sounding speech, synthesis and modeling of vocal disorders, and the development of speaker independent (or adaptive) speech recognition systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Speech Analysis Synthesis and Perception
Flanagan, J. L. (1972) · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-01562-9 · Cited by 1,469
Cited by
Tensor Fusion Network for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis
Zadeh, A., Chen, M., Poria, S., Cambria, E., & Morency, L.-P. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1115 · Cited by 2,102
Memory Fusion Network for Multi-view Sequential Learning
Zadeh, A., Liang, P. P., Mazumder, N., Poria, S., Cambria, E., & Morency, L.-P. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.12021 · Cited by 855
COVAREP — A collaborative voice analysis repository for speech technologies
Degottex, G., Kane, J., Drugman, T., Raitio, T., & Scherer, S. (2014) · 2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp.2014.6853739 · Cited by 695
Normalized amplitude quotient for parametrization of the glottal flow.
Alku, P., Bäckström, T., & Vilkman, E. (2002) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1490365 · Cited by 287
Interacting with computers by voice: automatic speech recognition and synthesis
O'Shaughnessy, D. (2003) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2003.817117 · Cited by 132
Metadata
- Authors
- Childers, D. G., & Lee, C. K.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1991-11-01
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2394-2410
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2051457717
- Cited by
- 457
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vocal quality factors: Analysis, synthesis, and perception. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.402044
- The paper
- Childers, D. G., & Lee, C. K. (1991). Vocal quality factors: Analysis, synthesis, and perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.402044
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.