Cited by 855Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsTime Series Analysis and ForecastingTopic Modeling

Memory Fusion Network for Multi-view Sequential Learning

Open access
Zadeh, Amir, Liang, Paul Pu, Mazumder, Navonil, Poria, Soujanya, Cambria, Erik, Morency, Louis-Philippe·2018·Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Multi-view sequential learning is a fundamental problem in machine learning dealing with multi-view sequences. In a multi-view sequence, there exists two forms of interactions between different views: view-specific interactions and cross-view interactions. In this paper, we present a new neural architecture for multi-view sequential learning called the Memory Fusion Network (MFN) that explicitly accounts for both interactions in a neural architecture and continuously models them through time. The first component of the MFN is called the System of LSTMs, where view-specific interactions are learned in isolation through assigning an LSTM function to each view. The cross-view interactions are then identified using a special attention mechanism called the Delta-memory Attention Network (DMAN) and summarized through time with a Multi-view Gated Memory. Through extensive experimentation, MFN is compared to various proposed approaches for multi-view sequential learning on multiple publicly available benchmark datasets. MFN outperforms all the multi-view approaches. Furthermore, MFN outperforms all current state-of-the-art models, setting new state-of-the-art results for all three multi-view datasets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/aaai.v32i1.12021

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Alku, P.; Strik, H.; and Vilkman, E. 1997. Parabolic spectral parametera new method for quantification of the glottal flow. Speech Communication 22(1):67-79.
  2. Degottex, G.; Kane, J.; Drugman, T.; Raitio, T.; and Scherer, S. 2014. Covarepa collaborative voice analysis repository for speech technologies. In Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2014 IEEE International Conference on , 960-964. IEEE.
  3. Perez-Rosas, V.; Mihalcea, R.; and Morency, L.-P. 2013. UtteranceLevel Multimodal Sentiment Analysis. In Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zadeh, A., Liang, P. P., Mazumder, N., Poria, S., Cambria, E., & Morency, L.-P.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • Instituto Politécnico Nacional (MX)
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Venue
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2018-04-27
Volume
32
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-3468
OpenAlex
W2787581402
Cited by
855
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 100 · 2025: 169 · 2024: 163 · 2023: 125 · 2022: 118 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 16
FWCI
13.57
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
LSTM, attention mechanism, temporal modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review