Cited by 641

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Localization using nonindividualized head-related transfer functions

Wenzel, Elizabeth M., Arruda, Marianne, Kistler, Doris J., Wightman, Frederic L.·1993·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Abstract

A recent development in human–computer interfaces is the virtual acoustic display, a device that synthesizes three-dimensional, spatial auditory information over headphones using digital filters constructed from head-related transfer functions (HRTFs). The utility of such a display depends on the accuracy with which listeners can localize virtual sound sources. A previous study [F. L. Wightman and D. J. Kistler, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 868–878 (1989)] observed accurate localization by listeners for free-field sources and for virtual sources generated from the subjects’ own HRTFs. In practice, measurement of the HRTFs of each potential user of a spatial auditory display may not be feasible. Thus, a critical research question is whether listeners can obtain adequate localization cues from stimuli based on nonindividualized transforms. Here, inexperienced listeners judged the apparent direction (azimuth and elevation) of wideband noisebursts presented in the free-field or over headphones; headphone stimuli were synthesized using HRTFs from a representative subject of Wightman and Kistler. When confusions were resolved, localization of virtual sources was quite accurate and comparable to the free-field sources for 12 of the 16 subjects. Of the remaining subjects, 2 showed poor elevation accuracy in both stimulus conditions, and 2 showed degraded elevation accuracy with virtual sources. Many of the listeners also showed high rates of front-back and up-down confusions that increased significantly for virtual sources compared to the free-field stimuli. These data suggest that while the interaural cues to horizontal location are robust, the spectral cues considered important for resolving location along a particular cone-of-confusion are distorted by a synthesis process that uses nonindividualized HRTFs.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1121/1.407089

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wenzel, E. M., Arruda, M., Kistler, D. J., & Wightman, F. L.
Affiliations
  • Aerospace Human Factors Research Division, NASA-Ames Research Center, Mail Stop 262-2, Moffett Field, California 94035-1000
  • Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53705
  • Department of Psychology and Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53705
Venue
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
1993-07-01
Volume
94
Issue
1
Pages
111-123
ISSN
  • 0001-4966
  • 1520-8524
Cited by
641
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review