The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Localization using nonindividualized head-related transfer functions
Abstract
A recent development in human–computer interfaces is the virtual acoustic display, a device that synthesizes three-dimensional, spatial auditory information over headphones using digital filters constructed from head-related transfer functions (HRTFs). The utility of such a display depends on the accuracy with which listeners can localize virtual sound sources. A previous study [F. L. Wightman and D. J. Kistler, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 868–878 (1989)] observed accurate localization by listeners for free-field sources and for virtual sources generated from the subjects’ own HRTFs. In practice, measurement of the HRTFs of each potential user of a spatial auditory display may not be feasible. Thus, a critical research question is whether listeners can obtain adequate localization cues from stimuli based on nonindividualized transforms. Here, inexperienced listeners judged the apparent direction (azimuth and elevation) of wideband noisebursts presented in the free-field or over headphones; headphone stimuli were synthesized using HRTFs from a representative subject of Wightman and Kistler. When confusions were resolved, localization of virtual sources was quite accurate and comparable to the free-field sources for 12 of the 16 subjects. Of the remaining subjects, 2 showed poor elevation accuracy in both stimulus conditions, and 2 showed degraded elevation accuracy with virtual sources. Many of the listeners also showed high rates of front-back and up-down confusions that increased significantly for virtual sources compared to the free-field stimuli. These data suggest that while the interaural cues to horizontal location are robust, the spectral cues considered important for resolving location along a particular cone-of-confusion are distorted by a synthesis process that uses nonindividualized HRTFs.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the mean localization error in the up/down dimension can range between 5° and 40°, depending on the listener (Wenzel et al. 1993)”
From An investigation of matching symmetry in the human pinnae with possible implications for 3D ear recognition and sound localization (2015) · cites this paper as Wenzel et al. 1993
In the citing paper
“Some listeners outperform others by a factor of 20 in a front/back localization task (Wenzel et al. 1993)”
From An investigation of matching symmetry in the human pinnae with possible implications for 3D ear recognition and sound localization (2015) · cites this paper as Wenzel et al. 1993
In the citing paper
“psychoacoustic localization experiments do show that there is a large variability in the human ability to localize sounds in front/back and up/down dimensions”
From An investigation of matching symmetry in the human pinnae with possible implications for 3D ear recognition and sound localization (2015) · cites this paper as Wenzel et al. 1993
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A user study of auditory versus visual interfaces for use while driving
Sodnik, J., Dicke, C., Tomažič, S., & Billinghurst, M. (2008) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.11.001 · Cited by 134
Application of a Three-Dimensional Auditory Display in a Flight Task
Bronkhorst, A. W., Veltman, J. A. (., & Van Breda, L. (1996) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872096778940859 · Cited by 100
Psychophysical customization of directional transfer functions for virtual sound localization
Middlebrooks, J. C., Macpherson, E. A., & Onsan, Z. A. (2000) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1322026 · Cited by 59
Faster Text-to-Speeches: Enhancing Blind People's Information Scanning with Faster Concurrent Speech
Guerreiro, J., & Gonçalves, D. (2015) · Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility - ASSETS '15 · doi:10.1145/2700648.2809840 · Cited by 41
Claes, P., Reijniers, J., Shriver, M. D., Snyders, J., Suetens, P., Nielandt, J., De Tré, G., & Vandermeulen, D. (2015) · Journal of Anatomy · doi:10.1111/joa.12252 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Wenzel, E. M., Arruda, M., Kistler, D. J., & Wightman, F. L.
- Affiliations
- Aerospace Human Factors Research Division, NASA-Ames Research Center, Mail Stop 262-2, Moffett Field, California 94035-1000
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53705
- Department of Psychology and Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53705
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1993-07-01
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 111-123
- ISSN
- 0001-4966
- 1520-8524
- Cited by
- 641
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review