The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise.
Abstract
Two experiments using the materials of the Revised Speech Perception in Noise (SPIN-R) Test [Bilger et al., J. Speech Hear. Res. 27, 32–48 (1984)] were conducted to investigate age-related differences in the identification and the recall of sentence-final words heard in a babble background. In experiment 1, the level of the babble was varied to determine psychometric functions (percent correct word identification as a function of S/N ratio) for presbycusics, old adults with near-normal hearing, and young normal-hearing adults, when the sentence-final words were either predictable (high context) or unpredictable (low context). Differences between the psychometric functions for high- and low-context conditions were used to show that both groups of old listeners derived more benefit from supportive context than did young listeners. In experiment 2, a working memory task [Daneman and Carpenter, J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 19, 450–466 (1980)] was added to the SPIN task for young and old adults. Specifically, after listening to and identifying the sentence-final words for a block of n sentences, the subjects were asked to recall the last n words that they had identified. Old subjects recalled fewer of the items they had perceived than did young subjects in all S/N conditions, even though there was no difference in the recall ability of the two age groups when sentences were read. Furthermore, the number of items recalled by both age groups was reduced in adverse S/N conditions. The results were interpreted as supporting a processing model in which reallocable processing resources are used to support auditory processing when listening becomes difficult either because of noise, or because of age-related deterioration in the auditory system. Because of this reallocation, these resources are unavailable to more central cognitive processes such as the storage and retrieval functions of working memory, so that ‘‘upstream’’ processing of auditory information is adversely affected.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“By manipulating input-related demands (e.g., the amount or type of background noise) and measuring listening span, it is possible to examine the effects of the manipulation on the allocation of capacity (e.g., Pichora-Fuller et al. 1995).”
From Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL) (2016) · cites this paper as Pichora-Fuller et al. 1995
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 965
Age-Related Differences in Lexical Access Relate to Speech Recognition in Noise
Carroll, R., Warzybok, A., Kollmeier, B., & Ruigendijk, E. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00990 · Cited by 53
“This finding for working memory stands in opposition to previous studies (e.g., Pichora-Fuller et al., 1995; Desjardins and Doherty, Dependent variable: GÖSA speech recognition (z-transformed); random effect: LISTENER (intercept; variance = 0.09 ± 0.30); Number of observations = 77; 39 listeners;…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialERP evidence that auditory-visual speech facilitates working memory in younger and older adults.
Frtusova, J. B., Winneke, A. H., & Phillips, N. (2013) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0031243 · Cited by 49
The Effect of Lexical Frequency on Spoken Word Recognition in Young and Older Listeners
Revill, K., & Spieler, D. H. (2011) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0024113 · Cited by 49
Francis, A. L. (2010) · Attention, perception & psychophysics · doi:10.3758/app.72.2.501 · Cited by 49
Cortical oscillations and entrainment in speech processing during working memory load
Hjortkjær, J., Märcher‐Rørsted, J., Fuglsang, S. A., & Dau, T. (2018) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.13855 · Cited by 51
Knight, S., & Heinrich, A. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00230 · Cited by 48
Thompson, E. C., Carr, K. W., White-Schwoch, T., Otto-Meyer, S., & Kraus, N. (2016) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2016.11.007 · Cited by 48
“In this older cohort, speech perception in noise additionally relies upon a number of cognitive and linguistic factors including selective attention, short-term memory, and lexical knowledge (Lewis et al., 2010; Pichora-Fuller et al., 1995).”
BackgroundWhitford, V., & Titone, D. A. (2016) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0039971 · Cited by 97
Acoustic masking disrupts time-dependent mechanisms of memory encoding in word-list recall
Cousins, K. A. Q., Dar, H., Wingfield, A., & Miller, P. C. (2013) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0377-7 · Cited by 45
Elucidating the effects of ageing on remembering perceptually distorted word pairs
Heinrich, A., & Schneider, B. (2011) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2010.492621 · Cited by 48
“For further details concerning this method see Pichora-Fuller et al. (2007). To find a parameter combination that degraded perceptual accuracy of the words to 91%, we decided to keep the rate of change in time delay constant (at 100-Hz bandwidth, BW) and only to vary the range of time delays introduced into the signal.”
MethodSelf-citationLong Reverberation Time Decreases Recall of Spoken Information
Ljung, R., & Kjellberg, A. (2009) · Building Acoustics · doi:10.1260/135101009790291273 · Cited by 48
“Similar reasoning is found in a major literature, for example [2, 14, 13, 23].”
BackgroundResultConsonant recognition loss in hearing impaired listeners.
Phatak, S. A., Yoon, Y.-S., Gooler, D., & Allen, J. (2009) · Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.3238257 · Cited by 48
“Pichora-Fuller et al., 1995".”
Beaman, P. (2004) · The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/09541440440000023 · Cited by 46
White‐Schwoch, T., Nicol, T. G., Warrier, C. M., Abrams, D. A., & Kraus, N. (2016) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhw293 · Cited by 45
Age-Related Changes in Objective and Subjective Speech Perception in Complex Listening Environments
Helfer, K. S., Merchant, G. R., & Wasiuk, P. A. (2017) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2017_jslhr-h-17-0030 · Cited by 50
Ljung, R., Israelsson, K., & Hygge, S. (2012) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.2896 · Cited by 45
The effects of blurred vision on auditory-visual speech perception in younger and older adults
Legault, I., Gagné, J., Rhoualem, W., & Gosselin, P. A. (2010) · International Journal of Audiology · doi:10.3109/14992027.2010.509112 · Cited by 50
Tune In or Tune Out: Age-Related Differences in Listening to Speech in Music
Russo, F., & Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (2008) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0b013e31817bdd1f · Cited by 46
“Comparison of the average word identification scores (displayed as percent correct) obtained by younger and older listeners for words in high-context and low-context SPIN-R sentences presented at 0 and 4 dB S:B in the current study and a previous study (Pichora-Fuller et al., 1995).”
BackgroundSelf-citationFrom sounds to meaning: the role of attention during auditory scene analysis
Alain, C., & Bernstein, L. (2008) · doi:10.1097/moo.0b013e32830e2096 · Cited by 46
Age-related differences in listening effort during degraded speech recognition
Ward, K. M., Shen, J., Souza, P., & Grieco-Calub, T. M. (2017) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000000355 · Cited by 46
Auditory Perceptual Learning in Adults with and without Age-Related Hearing Loss
Karawani, H., Bitan, T., Attias, J., & Banai, K. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02066 · Cited by 49
“Specifically, older adults often experience considerable difficulties when listening to speech in the presence of background noise, to competing speech signals or to rapid speech (Pichora-Fuller et al., 1995).”
BackgroundMethodSpeech perception in noise for bilingual listeners with normal hearing
Mendel, L. L., & Widner, H. (2016) · International Journal of Audiology · doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1061710 · Cited by 44
“When one adds hearing loss to the mix, bottom-up cues are further reduced, diminishing the listener’s ability to use top-down processing due to the increase in cognitive load (Pichora-Fuller et al, 1995; Lunner, 2003; Schneider et al, 2005).”
BackgroundExamining the effects of a targeted noise reduction program in a neonatal intensive care unit
Wang, D., Aubertin, C., Barrowman, N., Moreau, K., Dunn, S., & Harrold, J. (2013) · Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition · doi:10.1136/archdischild-2013-304928 · Cited by 44
Effect of hospital noise on patients' ability to hear, understand, and recall speech
Pope, D. S., Gallun, F. J., & Kampel, S. D. (2013) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.21540 · Cited by 41
“Older listeners have been shown to gain even more from context than do younger listeners (Pichora-Fuller et al., 1995).”
BackgroundTraining to Improve Language Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients
Ingvalson, E. M., & Wong, P. C. M. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00263 · Cited by 65
Audiovisual benefit for recognition of speech presented with single-talker noise in older listeners
Jesse, A., & Janse, E. (2012) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690965.2011.620335 · Cited by 39
“Context information generally aids the recognition of upcoming speech (eg, Pichora-Fuller, Schneider, & Daneman, 1995 ).”
BackgroundEzzatian, P., Li, L., Pichora-Fuller, K., & Schneider, B. (2010) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0b013e3181ee6b8a · Cited by 44
“Because older adults, under some conditions, have been shown to benefit more than younger adults from sentence context (Pichora-Fuller et al. 1995; Pichora-Fuller 2008; Sheldon et al. 2008a), their age advantage in this regard could have offset an age-related reduction in the ability to use topic knowledge to improve…”
BackgroundSelf-citationGordon-Salant, S., Yeni-Komshian, G., & Fitzgibbons, P. J. (2008) · Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.2982409 · Cited by 44
Dingemanse, J. G., & Goedegebure, A. (2019) · Trends in Hearing · doi:10.1177/2331216519838672 · Cited by 43
Costs of switching auditory spatial attention in following conversational turn-taking
Lin, G., & Carlile, S. (2015) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2015.00124 · Cited by 45
“While this is advantageous in a controlled environment for isolating recall costs, in real world situations context plays an important role in stream formation and discourse comprehension (Pichora-Fuller et al., 1995).”
BackgroundMethodGordon, M. S., & Allen, S. (2009) · Experimental Aging Research · doi:10.1080/03610730902720398 · Cited by 43
The Contribution of Amplitude Envelope Cues to Sentence Identification in Young and Aged Listeners
Souza, P., & Kitch, V. J. (2001) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/00003446-200104000-00004 · Cited by 43
Pichora-Fuller, M., Johnson, C. E., & Roodenburg, K. E. J. (1998) · Journal of Applied Communication Research · doi:10.1080/00909889809365494 · Cited by 43
Self-citationBaese-Berk, M., Levi, S., & Engen, K. V. V. (2023) · Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0016806 · Cited by 42
Francis, A. L., MacPherson, M. K., Chandrasekaran, B., & Alvar, A. M. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00263 · Cited by 42
The Impact of Noise and Hearing Loss on the Processing of Simultaneous Sentences
Best, V., Gallun, F. J., Mason, C. R., Kidd, G. D., & Shinn‐Cunningham, B. G. (2010) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0b013e3181c34ba6 · Cited by 37
“The chosen shift value gave the smallest mean absolute error across the two error types in the single task. previously to explain the effect of noise on the ability to store part of a single-attended message for later recall (Rabbitt 1968; Pichora-Fuller et al. 1995).”
BackgroundInfluentialNeural and behavioral changes after the use of hearing aids
Karawani, H., Jenkins, K. A., & Anderson, S. (2018) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2018.03.024 · Cited by 41
Recognition memory in noise for speech of varying intelligibility.
Gilbert, R. C., Chandrasekaran, B., & Smiljanic, R. (2012) · Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4838975 · Cited by 41
Medial Olivocochlear Functioning and Speech Perception in Noise in Older Adults
Mukari, S. Z., & Mamat, W. (2008) · Audiology and Neurotology · doi:10.1159/000128978 · Cited by 41
“…[Humes and Christopherson, 1991; Humes et al., 1994; Jerger et al., 1991], agerelated degenerative changes in the central auditory system [Walton et al., 1998; Snell and Frisina, 2000] and a decline in cognitive ability with age [Pichora-Fuller, 2003; Pichora-Fuller et al., 1995; Wingfield, 1996].”
BackgroundAging and the perceptual organisation of sounds: a change of scene?
Alain, C., Dyson, B., & Snyder, J. (2006) · doi:10.1016/b978-012369391-4/50065-5 · Cited by 41
“For instance, in speech processing, the use of prior context helps listeners to identify the final word of a sentence embedded in noise ( Pichora-Fuller, Schneider, and Daneman, 1995 ).”
BackgroundInfluentialBuss, E., Hodge, S. E., Calandruccio, L., Leibold, L., & Grose, J. (2019) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000000692 · Cited by 40
“We did not observe a significantly larger benefit of semantic context in older adults, an outcome that is sometimes reported (Pichora-Fuller et al. 1995; Sommers & Danielson 1999).”
BackgroundHolmes, E., Folkeard, P., Johnsrude, I. S., & Scollie, S. D. (2018) · International Journal of Audiology · doi:10.1080/14992027.2018.1432901 · Cited by 39
“Listeners with hearing impairment can also use contextual (Desjardins and Doherty 2014; Pichora-Fuller, Schneider, and Daneman 1995) and visual lip movement (e.g. Winn et al. 2013) information to improve speech intelligibility.”
BackgroundInfluentialExtrinsic Cognitive Load Impairs Spoken Word Recognition in High- and Low-Predictability Sentences
Hunter, C. R., & Pisoni, D. (2017) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000000493 · Cited by 40
Susceptibility to interference by music and speech maskers in middle-aged adults.
Başkent, D., van Engelshoven, S., & Galvin, J. J. (2014) · Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4865261 · Cited by 40
“Age-related changes in cognitive functioning may additionally contribute to older listeners’ poorer speech understanding in noise (Pichora-Fuller et al., 1995; Helfer and Freyman, 2008).”
BackgroundResultKidd, G., & Humes, L. (2012) · Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.3675975 · Cited by 40
“This will allow us to determine whether context effects and age effects with interrupted speech differ from those obtained with other types of degraded speech (e.g., Pichora-Fuller et al., 1995; Sheldon et al., 2008).”
BackgroundMethodAging, context processing, and comprehension
Payne, B. R., & Silcox, J. W. (2019) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/bs.plm.2019.07.001 · Cited by 48
Glass, J. M. (2007) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.22.2.233 · Cited by 39
Auditory Processing Performance of the Middle-Aged and Elderly: Auditory or Cognitive Decline?
Murphy, C. F. B., Rabelo, C. M., Silagi, M. L., Mansur, L. L., Bamiou, D., & Schochat, E. (2017) · Journal of the American Academy of Audiology · doi:10.3766/jaaa.15098 · Cited by 52
“According to Pichora-Fuller et al (1995), working memory could be defined as a capacity-limited system in which information can be stored and manipulated using knowledge stored in long-term memory.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe Effect of Tinnitus on Listening Effort in Normal-Hearing Young Adults: A Preliminary Study.
Degeest, S., Keppler, H., & Corthals, P. (2017) · Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2016_jslhr-h-16-0090 · Cited by 39
Effect of Dysarthria Type, Speaking Condition, and Listener Age on Speech Intelligibility.
McAuliffe, M., Fletcher, A. R., Kerr, S. E., O'Beirne, G., & Anderson, T. (2017) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2016_ajslp-15-0182 · Cited by 39
A Model of Auditory-Cognitive Processing and Relevance to Clinical Applicability.
Edwards, B. (2016) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000000308 · Cited by 39
“The effects of hearing ability on cognitive functioning have been well demonstrated in studies where hearing ability has been altered by manipulating the level of presentation of speech (Baldwin & Ash 2011), by varying the signal-to-noise ratio (Pichora-Fuller et al. 1995), by studying people with varying degrees of h…”
BackgroundEffects of noise and audiovisual cues on speech processing in adults with and without ADHD
Michalek, A. M. P., Watson, S. M. R., Ash, I. K., Ringleb, S. I., & Raymer, A. M. (2014) · International Journal of Audiology · doi:10.3109/14992027.2013.866282 · Cited by 39
Zekveld, A., Festen, J., & Kramer, S. (2013) · Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0058 · Cited by 39
Pragmatics of conversation and communication in noisy settings
McKellin, W. H., Shahin, K. N., Hodgson, M. R., Jamieson, J. R., & Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (2007) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.012 · Cited by 35
Modeling age-related differences in immediate memory using SIMPLE.
Surprenant, A. M., Neath, I., & Brown, G. D. A. (2006) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.001 · Cited by 39
“Thus, although the distortion of the signal had no overt effect on identification (Rabbitt, 1991), and identification performance was equated (Pichora-Fuller et al., 1995), there were still effects of hearing loss and aging on memory and comprehension (see also Rabbitt, 1990; Surprenant, 1999 Surprenant, in press).”
BackgroundMethodSommers, M. S. (1997) · Journal of The American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb03101.x · Cited by 39
Effects of Aging on Cortical Representations of Continuous SpeechPreprint
Karunathilake, I. M. D., Dunlap, J. L., Perera, J., Presacco, A., Decruy, L., Anderson, S., Kuchinsky, S. E., & Simon, J. (2023) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2022.08.22.504825 · Cited by 38
“…to a very short narrative segments (with 4–7 key words) with no time limit, and the older subjects may have benefited not only from their extended vocabulary and language experience (Pichora-Fuller et al. 1995; Pichora-Fuller 2008; Schneider et al. 2016) but also from the lack of time demands.”
BackgroundKoeritzer, M. A., Rogers, C. S., Engen, K. J. V., & Peelle, J. E. (2018) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2017_jslhr-h-17-0077 · Cited by 48
“…are often reported to benefit more from semantic context in speech processing than do young adults (Wingfield, Aberdeen, & Stine, 1991), this finding is not universal and may depend on the specific SNRs tested or the type of context available (Dubno et al., 2000; Pichora-Fuller et al., 1995).”
BackgroundDisregarding hearing loss leads to overestimation of age-related cognitive decline
Guerreiro, M. J. S., & Gerven, P. W. M. V. (2017) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.05.001 · Cited by 47
“…to their hearing acuity (Verhaegen et al., 2014; see also Füllgrabe et al., 2015), the present study indicates that age-related differences in auditory working memory remain when the effect of age-related hearing loss is minimized (see also Baldwin and Ash, 2011; Pichora-Fuller et al., 1995).”
BackgroundInfluentialShi, L.-F. (2011) · American Journal of Audiology · doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0013 · Cited by 38
How Age Affects Auditory-Cognitive Interactions in Speech Comprehension
Schneider, B. (2011) · Audiology Research · doi:10.4081/audiores.2011.e10 · Cited by 38
“, His plan meant taking a big risk), at these individually-tailored SNRs, speech recognition in older adults actually improves more than it does in younger adults (Pichora-Fuller et al., 1995).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationRecognition of Rapid Speech by Blind and Sighted Older Adults
Gordon-Salant, S. M., & Friedman, S. A. (2010) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/10-0052 · Cited by 34
Lau, K., Dimitriadis, P. A., Mitchell, C. A., Martyn-St-James, M., Hind, D., & Ray, J. (2021) · The Journal of Laryngology & Otology · doi:10.1017/s0022215121004114 · Cited by 61
Longitudinal study of self‐reported hearing loss and subjective cognitive function decline in women
Curhan, S. G., Willett, W. C., Grodstein, F., & Curhan, G. C. (2019) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2019.08.194 · Cited by 46
Music perception improves in children with bilateral cochlear implants or bimodal devices
Polonenko, M. J., Giannantonio, S., Papsin, B. C., Marsella, P., & Gordon, K. A. (2017) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4985123 · Cited by 40
“…with data showing reduced listening effort in bilateral than unilateral CI users (Hughes and Galvin, 2013; Noble et al., 2008), and with the cognitive resource allocation hypothesis or effortfulness hypothesis (Kahneman, Daniel, 1973; McCoy et al., 2005; Pichora-Fuller et al., 1995; Rabbitt, 1990).”
BackgroundTask-Related Vigilance During Word Recognition in Noise for Older Adults with Hearing Loss
Kuchinsky, S. E., Vaden, K. I., Ahlstrom, J. B., Cute, S. L., Humes, L. E., Dubno, J. R., & Eckert, M. A. (2015) · Experimental Aging Research · doi:10.1080/0361073x.2016.1108712 · Cited by 44
Effects of Age on Concurrent Vowel Perception in Acoustic and Simulated Electroacoustic Hearing
Arehart, K., Souza, P., Muralimanohar, R., & Miller, C. W. (2010) · Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0145 · Cited by 37
Drager, K., & Reichle, J. E. (2001) · Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2001/083 · Cited by 37
Children's perception of nonnative-accented sentences in noise and quiet.
Bent, T., & Atagi, E. (2015) · Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4938228 · Cited by 36
Age and Measurement Time-of-Day Effects on Speech Recognition in Noise
Veneman, C. E., Gordon-Salant, S. M., Matthews, L. J., & Dubno, J. R. (2012) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0b013e31826d0b81 · Cited by 43
“The digit-span test was selected as one of several auditory tasks of working memory available (e.g., the auditory forms of the N-Back test [Kirchner 1958; Monk et al. 2011] or the Reading Span Test [R-SPAN; Daneman & Carpenter 1980; Pichora-Fuller et al. 1995]), which has no visual components.”
Learning speech-in-noise discrimination in adult humans
Cainer, K. E., James, C., & Rajan, R. (2007) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2007.10.001 · Cited by 39
The effects of context and feedback on age differences in spoken word recognition.
Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Miller, L. M. S., & Nevin, J. A. (1999) · The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/54b.2.p125 · Cited by 36
“Regardless of the time course, however, the explanation in the cognitive aging literature for elders' greater reliance on context (when it is found) is that the activation of lexical candidates by the context enables older adults to "fill in" the gaps created in the auditory input by an impoverished auditory system (c…”
BackgroundCognition as a bridge between signal and dialogue: communication in the hearing impaired and deaf.
Rönnberg, J., Andersson, J., Andersson, U., Johansson, K., Lyxell, B., & Samuelsson, S. (1998) · Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum · doi:10.1080/010503998420720 · Cited by 36
Strand, J. F., Ray, L., Dillman-Hasso, N. H., Villanueva, J., & Brown, V. A. (2020) · Auditory Perception & Cognition · doi:10.31234/osf.io/3e7mf · Cited by 35
“When the speech is presented in noise, researchers typically give participants credit for recalling a word as it was perceived (e.g., Brown & Strand, 2019; Johnson et al., 2015; Ng et al., 2013; Pichora-Fuller et al., 1995; Sarampalis et al., 2009) or adjust for recall performance of the last item in the list (which s…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAyasse, N. D., & Wingfield, A. (2018) · Trends in Hearing · doi:10.1177/2331216518790907 · Cited by 41
“…and recall of impoverished but suprathreshold auditory stimuli, and especially so for older adults, and older adults with mild-to-moderate hearing impairment (e.g., DeCaro et al., 2016; Pichora-Fuller et al., 1995; Surprenant, 2007; Ward et al., 2016; Wingfield et al., 2005, 2006; Winn, 2016).”
BackgroundCingulo-opercular activity affects incidental memory encoding for speech in noise
Vaden, K. I., Teubner-Rhodes, S. E., Ahlstrom, J. B., Dubno, J. R., & Eckert, M. A. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.028 · Cited by 34
“Poor recall of words occurs in difficult listening conditions, such as in background noise, even when those words were understood (Murphy et al., 2000; Pichora-Fuller et al., 1995; Rabbitt, 1968; Ward et al., 2016).”
InfluentialComprehension of Speeded Discourse by Younger and Older Listeners
Gordon, M. S., Daneman, M., & Schneider, B. (2009) · Experimental Aging Research · doi:10.1080/03610730902769262 · Cited by 35
“…in previous samples collected over the past 8 years. that older adults depend on and may make more effective use of inguistic context (e.g., Pichora-Fuller et al., 1995) and world knowledge (Miller, Stine-Morrow, Kirkorian, & Conroy, 2004; Rybash, Roodin, & Hoyer, 1995) than do younger…”
BackgroundSelf-citationGender Differences in the Association Between Hearing Loss and Cognitive Function
Huang, B., Cao, G., Duan, Y., Yan, S., Yan, M., Yin, P., & Jiang, H. (2020) · American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias® · doi:10.1177/1533317519871167 · Cited by 34
“These reallocation resources are not available for more central cognitive processes, resulting in impaired other cognitive processes such as executive functions and working memory resources.(40,41) This could explain why, in this study, moderate/severe hearing loss was associated with a lower Animal Fluency Test score…”
BackgroundReinhart, P., & Souza, P. (2016) · Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2016_jslhr-h-15-0371 · Cited by 34
Acoustic Detail But Not Predictability of Task-Irrelevant Speech Disrupts Working Memory
Wöstmann, M., & Obleser, J. (2016) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00538 · Cited by 35
Acoustic Detail Guides Attention Allocation in a Selective Listening Task
Wöstmann, M., Schröger, E., & Obleser, J. (2014) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00761 · Cited by 32
Recognition of accented and unaccented speech in different maskers by younger and older listeners.
Gordon-Salant, S., Yeni-Komshian, G., Fitzgibbons, P. J., Cohen, J. I., & Waldroup, C. (2013) · Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4807817 · Cited by 34
“…on reduced audibility (Humes and Dubno, 2010), diminished temporal processing (Pichora-Fuller et al., 2007), and reduced cognitive capacity (e.g., selective attention, executive function, speed of processing, working memory) (Pichora-Fuller et al., 1995; Tun et al., 2002; Schneider et al., 2007).”
BackgroundResultOtoacoustic emissions, pure-tone audiometry, and self-reported hearing
Engdahl, B., Tambs, K., & Hoffman, H. (2013) · International Journal of Audiology · doi:10.3109/14992027.2012.733423 · Cited by 34
“However, our results agree with results from performance-based tests: Older persons have poorer speech identifi cation abilities for a given hearing threshold level (Pichora-Fuller et al, 1995; Gatehouse, 1990).”
ResultEinarsson, E., Petersen, H., Wiebe, T., Fransson, P., Magnusson, M., & Moëll, C. (2011) · International Journal of Audiology · doi:10.3109/14992027.2011.585667 · Cited by 34
Köbler, S., Lindblad, A., Olofsson, Å., & Hagerman, B. (2010) · International Journal of Audiology · doi:10.3109/14992027.2010.481774 · Cited by 34
“This increased effort consumes cognitive processing resources which results in an overall defi cit in working memory (Pichora-Fuller et al, 1995; Lunner, 2003).”
BackgroundDesigning effective risk communications for older adults
McLaughlin, A. C., & Mayhorn, C. B. (2012) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2012.05.002 · Cited by 36
Effects of Age on Dual-Task Walking While Listening
Nieborowska, V., Lau, S.-T., Campos, J. L., Pichora-Fuller, M., Novak, A., & Li, K. Z. H. (2018) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222895.2018.1498318 · Cited by 33
Self-citationSmith, S. L., Pichora-Fuller, M., Wilson, R., & MacDonald, E. N. (2012) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0b013e318242571c · Cited by 33
“The results for younger listeners in the simulated auditory aging condition with low-context R-SPIN sentences were comparable with previous results for older adults with normal pure-tone thresholds through 3000 Hz to whom unaltered R-SPIN sentences had been presented (Pichora-Fuller et al. 1995).”
ResultSelf-citationFrancis, A. L., Bent, T., Schumaker, J., Love, J., & Silbert, N. H. (2021) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-020-02195-9 · Cited by 37
Cognitive Evaluation of Cochlear Implanted Adults Using CODEX and MoCA Screening Tests.
Ambert-Dahan, E., Routier, S., Marot, L., Bouccara, D., Sterkers, O., Ferrary, E., & Mosnier, I. (2017) · Otology and Neurotology · doi:10.1097/mao.0000000000001464 · Cited by 32
“Therefore, auditory rehabilitation (hearing aids, cochlear implants), and auditory-cognitive training have been proposed to counteract the reallocation of cognitive abilities such as working memory or speed of processing due to hearing loss (5,6).”
BackgroundBent, T., & Atagi, E. (2017) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/0023830916645374 · Cited by 32
“Some cognitive-linguistic skills– such as short-term memory and vocabulary knowledge–may be important for both perception of speech in noise (Pichora-Fuller et al., 1995; Tamati et al., 2013; van Rooij & Plomp, 1990) and for perception of speech that deviates from native language norms (Banks,…”
BackgroundKawata, N. Y. S., Nouchi, R., Oba, K., Matsuzaki, Y., & Kawashima, R. (2022) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2022.826672 · Cited by 40
White, B. E., & Langdon, C. (2021) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118324 · Cited by 41
McHaney, J. R., Gnanateja, G. N., Smayda, K. E., Zinszer, B. D., & Chandrasekaran, B. (2020) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000000923 · Cited by 31
“Studies in older adults have demonstrated that peripheral hearing loss and deficits in cognitive functioning, moderated by motivation, are associated with impaired speech perception in noise performance (Humes & Roberts 1990; Pichora-Fuller et al. 1995; Fitzgibbons & GordonSalant 1996; Anderson et al. 2012; Humes 2013…”
BackgroundInfluentialHearing loss in older adults ‐ From epidemiological insights to national initiatives
Goman, A. M., & Lin, F. (2018) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2018.03.031 · Cited by 31
“For example, interventions for hearing loss could improve speech understanding leading to reduced cognitive load of processing degraded sound (Tun et al., 2009; Pichora-Fuller et al., 1995).”
Koohi, N., Vickers, D., Lakshmanan, R., Chandrashekar, H., Werring, D., Warren, J., & Bamiou, D. (2017) · Journal of american academy of audiology · doi:10.3766/jaaa.15139 · Cited by 30
“…of sensory or perceptual deficit can result in ‘‘upstream’’ effects on memory and related cognitive abilities due to insufficient processing resources (Pichora-Fuller et al, 1995; McCoy et al, 2005), it is critical that audiologists are a part of the multidisciplinary team together with…”
BackgroundDevelopment and preliminary evaluation of a new test of ongoing speech comprehension
Best, V., Keidser, G., Buchholz, J. M., & Freeston, K. (2015) · International Journal of Audiology · doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1055835 · Cited by 30
Bertoli, S., & Bodmer, D. (2014) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2013.09.045 · Cited by 30
Kain, A., Amano-Kusumoto, A., & Hosom, J.-P. (2008) · Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.2967844 · Cited by 30
Meijer, W., de Groot, R. D., van Boxtel, M. V., van Gerven, P. V., & Jolles, J. (2006) · The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/61.5.p285 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Schneider, B. A., & Daneman, M.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1995-01-01
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 593-608
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2167685324
- Cited by
- 1,089
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 50
- FWCI
- 2.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Keywords
- speech perception in noise, age-related hearing loss, sentence-final words, word recall, working memory, context effects, babble, psychometric functions, signal-to-noise ratio, older adults
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aging, Auditory Threshold, Cognition, Hearing, Humans, Memory, Memory, Short-Term, Noise, Presbycusis, Speech Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
