The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Perceptual separation of concurrent speech sounds: Absence of across-frequency grouping by common interaural delay
Abstract
Three experiments and a computational model explored the role of within-channel and across-channel processes in the perceptual separation of competing, complex, broadband sounds which differed in their interaural phase spectra. In each experiment, two competing vowels, whose first and second formants were represented by two discrete bands of noise, were presented concurrently, for identification. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that listeners were able to identify the vowels accurately when each was presented to a different ear, but were unable to identify the vowels when they were presented with different interaural time delays (ITDs); i.e. listeners could not group the noisebands in different frequency regions with the same ITD and thereby separate them from bands in other frequency regions with a different ITD. Experiment 3 demonstrated that while listeners were unable to exploit a difference in interaural delay between the pairs of noisebands, listeners could identify a vowel defined by interaurally decorrelated noisebands when the other two noisebands were interaurally correlated. A computational model based upon that of Durlach [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 32, 1075–1076 (1960)] showed that the results of these and other experiments can be interpreted in terms of a within-channel mechanism, which is sensitive to interaural decorrelation. Thus the across-frequency integration which occurs in the lateralization of complex sounds may play little role in segregating concurrent sounds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
YIN, a fundamental frequency estimator for speech and music
de Cheveigné, A., & Kawahara, H. (2002) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1458024 · Cited by 1,920
The benefit of binaural hearing in a cocktail party: Effect of location and type of interferer
Hawley, M. L., Litovsky, R. Y., & Culling, J. F. (2004) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1639908 · Cited by 538
Self-citationBee, M. A., & Micheyl, C. (2008) · Journal of Comparative Psychology · doi:10.1037/0735-7036.122.3.235 · Cited by 347
Effects of attention and unilateral neglect on auditory stream segregation.
Carlyon, R. P., Cusack, R., Foxton, J. M., & Robertson, I. H. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.27.1.115 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Culling, J. F., & Summerfield, Q.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1995-08-01
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 785-797
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2130650491
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perceptual separation of concurrent speech sounds: Absence of across-frequency grouping by common interaural delay. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.413571
- The paper
- Culling, J. F., & Summerfield, Q. (1995). Perceptual separation of concurrent speech sounds: Absence of across-frequency grouping by common interaural delay. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.413571
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.