Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 770

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Shock wave emission and cavitation bubble generation by picosecond and nanosecond optical breakdown in water

Vogel, A., Busch, S., Parlitz, U.·1996·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Abstract

Shock wave emission and cavitation bubble expansion after optical breakdown in water with Nd:YAG laser pulses of 30-ps and 6-ns duration is investigated for energies between 50 μJ and 10 mJ which are often used for intraocular laser surgery. Time-resolved photography is applied to measure the position of the shock front and the bubble wall as a function of time. The photographs are used to determine the shock front and bubble wall velocity as well as the shock wave pressure as a function of time or position. Calculations of the bubble formation and shock wave emission are performed using the Gilmore model of cavitation bubble dynamics and the Kirkwood–Bethe hypothesis. The calculations are based on the laser pulse duration, the size of the plasma, and the maximally expanded cavitation bubble, i.e., on easily measurable parameters. They yield the dynamics of the bubble wall, the pressure evolution inside the bubble, and pressure profiles in the surrounding liquid at fixed times after the start of the laser pulse. The results of the calculations agree well with the experimental data. A large percentage of the laser pulse energy (up to 72%) is transformed into the mechanical energy ES and EB of the shock wave and cavitation bubble, whereby the partitioning between ES and EB is approximately equal. 65%–85% of ES is dissipated during the first 10 mm of shock wave propagation. The pressure at the plasma rim ranges from 1300 MPa (50 μJ, 30 ps) to 7150 MPa (10 mJ, 6 ns). The calculated initial shock wave duration has values between 20 and 58 ns, the duration measured 10 mm away from the plasma is between 43 and 148 ns. A formation phase of the shock front occurs after the ns pulses, but not after the ps pulses where the shock front exists already 100 ps after the start of the laser pulse. After shock front formation, the pressure decays approximately proportional to r−2, and at pressure values below 100 MPa proportional to r−1.06. The maximum bubble wall velocity ranges from 390 to 2450 m/s. The calculations of bubble and shock wave dynamics can cover a large parameter range and may thus serve as a tool for the optimization of laser parameters in medical laser applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1121/1.415878

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 770

Metadata

Authors
Vogel, A., Busch, S., & Parlitz, U.
Venue
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
1996-07-01
Volume
100
Issue
1
Pages
148-165
ISSN
  • 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-8524
OpenAlex
W1976028698
Cited by
770
References
0
FWCI
13.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Shock wave emission and cavitation bubble generation by picosecond and nanosecond optical breakdown in water. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.415878
The paper
Vogel, A., Busch, S., & Parlitz, U. (1996). Shock wave emission and cavitation bubble generation by picosecond and nanosecond optical breakdown in water. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.415878

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.