The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tutorial on sound propagation outdoors
Abstract
Concerns about noise in the community date back to the dawn of recorded history. Then, after centuries of relatively little activity, scientific interest grew during the 17th century and social concerns were again voiced during the 19th century. Many of the wave-propagation mechanisms relevant outdoors were understood at least qualitatively by the late 1800s. Today, knowledge of sound propagation phenomena is of great economic and social importance because of environmental and other concerns. Reality is more complicated than geometrical spreading above flat ground. Some grounds are acoustically hard like concrete, and others soft as snow. Corresponding reflection coefficients are complex and vary with angle. Grounds may not be flat, leading to shadow zones or alternatively multiple reflections at the ground. Gradients of wind or temperature refract waves either upwards (upwind or in a temperature lapse) or downwards (downwind or in a temperature inversion). Atmospheric turbulence causes fluctuations in the acoustical effects. Many of these features mutually interact. Measured sound pressure levels owe as much to near-surface weather and to ground shape and impedance as to acoustical factors such as source and receiver heights and their separation. This tutorial paper emphasizes field measurements and simple physical interpretations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The major features of our transmission loss curves (Figs 4, 5) are consistent with the measured curves and models of previous acoustic studies of sound propagation close to the ground (Embleton, 1996; Embleton et al., 1976, 1983).”
From Directional acoustic radiation in the strut display of male sage grouse Centrocercus urophasianus (1999) · cites this paper as Embleton, 1996
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–310 of 310
Marsot, M., Poulet, N., Delmotte, S., Côte, J., Delehelle, F., Descouens, D., Douay, G., Leclerc, A., Mulot, B., Chenet, B., et al. (2026) · International Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1007/s10764-025-00529-8
“…due to absorption by vegetation (Martens & Michelsen, 1981; Sel-kimäki et al., 2024), as do the rich organic matter on the forest floor (Swearingen & White, 2007; Van Renterghem et al., 2021), and reflections and diffractions caused by complex topography (Embleton, 1996; Marten & Marler, 1977).”
Chobeau, P. (2014) · doi:10.70675/7c32be14zf862z4e3cz96cfz6509af2721db
“Furthermore, it is well known that the turbulent flow can cause an acoustic shadow zone due to scattering of sound energy [91].”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Spatial Incidence of Hyperscale Data CentersPreprint
Chia, L. E., Hu, S., Wang, Q., & Fan, M. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6500238 · Cited by 1
Stengrim, M., Arruza, S., Judge, J., et al. (2026) · Acoustics · doi:10.3390/acoustics8020039
“A tutorial by Embleton in 1996 [3] focused on the physics of phenomena affecting outdoor sound propagation, a review by Bérengier et al. in 2003 [4] focused on the analytical and numerical aspects of the subject, and one by Wilson, Pettit, and Ostashev in 2015 [5] focused on the advancement of…”
History and current status of sound propagation in a turbulent atmosphere
Ostashev, V. E., & Wilson, D. K. (2026) · Waves in Random and Complex Media · doi:10.1080/17455030.2026.2696084
Ashizawa, T., Yen, B., & Nakadai, K. (2026) · Journal of the Robotics Society of Japan · doi:10.7210/jrsj.44.633
Szczodrak, M., Czyżewski, A., Kotus, J., et al. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10894-0_19
A Spatio-Temporal Conceptual Model for Sound Representation in Geographic Information Systems
Zaki, C., Taleb, H., Rizk, M., et al. (2026) · ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information · doi:10.3390/ijgi15090418
Zharassov, S., & Imanov, A. (2026) · Technobius · doi:10.54355/tbus/27897338.6.3.2026.0108
Metadata
- Authors
- Embleton, T. F. W.
- Affiliations
- 80 Sheardown Drive, Box 786, Nobleton, Ontario L0G 1N0, Canada
- Corresponding author
- Embleton, Tony F. W.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1996-07-01
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-48
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W2057468008
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 30.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Acoustics and Ultrasonics › Noise Effects and Management
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Acoustics and Ultrasonics › Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
- Keywords
- outdoor sound propagation, ground effect, ground impedance, shadow zone, atmospheric refraction, wind gradients, temperature inversion, atmospheric turbulence, sound pressure level, field measurements, community noise
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review