The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs
Abstract
Vowels, consonants, and sentences were processed through software emulations of cochlear-implant signal processors with 2–9 output channels. The signals were then presented, as either the sum of sine waves at the center of the channels or as the sum of noise bands the width of the channels, to normal-hearing listeners for identification. The results indicate, as previous investigations have suggested, that high levels of speech understanding can be obtained using signal processors with a small number of channels. The number of channels needed for high levels of performance varied with the nature of the test material. For the most difficult material—vowels produced by men, women, and girls—no statistically significant differences in performance were observed when the number of channels was increased beyond 8. For the least difficult material—sentences—no statistically significant differences in performance were observed when the number of channels was increased beyond 5. The nature of the output signal, noise bands or sine waves, made only a small difference in performance. The mechanism mediating the high levels of speech recognition achieved with only few channels of stimulation may be the same one that mediates the recognition of signals produced by speakers with a high fundamental frequency, i.e., the levels of adjacent channels are used to determine the frequency of the input signal. The results of an experiment in which frequency information was altered but temporal information was not altered indicates that vowel recognition is based on information in the frequency domain even when the number of channels of stimulation is small.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels
Peterson, G. E., & Barney, H. L. (1952) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1906875 · Cited by 2,837
Cited by
Friesen, L. M., Shannon, R. V., Baskent, D., & Wang, X. (2001) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1381538 · Cited by 1,049
The neural basis of temporal processing
Mauk, M. D., & Buonomano, D. V. (2004) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144247 · Cited by 976
Metadata
- Authors
- Dorman, M. F., Loizou, P. C., & Rainey, D.
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 1997-10-01
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2403-2411
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W1994657361
- Cited by
- 410
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1121/1.419603
- The paper
- Dorman, M. F., Loizou, P. C., & Rainey, D. (1997). Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.419603
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.