The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Regulation of glottal closure and airflow in a three-dimensional phonation model: implications for vocal intensity control.
Open accessAbstract
Maintaining a small glottal opening across a large range of voice conditions is critical to normal voice production. This study investigated the effectiveness of vocal fold approximation and stiffening in regulating glottal opening and airflow during phonation, using a three-dimensional numerical model of phonation. The results showed that with increasing subglottal pressure the vocal folds were gradually pushed open, leading to increased mean glottal opening and flow rate. A small glottal opening and a mean glottal flow rate typical of human phonation can be maintained against increasing subglottal pressure by proportionally increasing the degree of vocal fold approximation for low to medium subglottal pressures and vocal fold stiffening at high subglottal pressures. Although sound intensity was primarily determined by the subglottal pressure, the results suggest that, to maintain small glottal opening as the sound intensity increases, one has to simultaneously tighten vocal fold approximation and/or stiffen the vocal folds, resulting in increased glottal resistance, vocal efficiency, and fundamental frequency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Within this process, subglottal pressure determines vocal loudness whereas the adduction of the cricothyroid muscle impacts the F0 of the vocal source (Herbst et al., 2015; Zhang, 2015; Yao et al., 2016; Sundberg, 2017).”
From Voice Stress Analysis: A New Framework for Voice and Effort in Human Performance (2018) · cites this paper as Zhang, 2015
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“To allow this vibration, phonation requires a balance between subglottal pressure (i.e., the pressure of the airflow below the glottis or space between the vocal folds) and the tension, stiffness, vocal fold approximation and resistance of the vocal folds (for an extensive explanation on the connectedness of each of these vocal fold processes and the respective muscles, see Zhang, 2015)”
From Voice Stress Analysis: A New Framework for Voice and Effort in Human Performance (2018) · cites this paper as Zhang, 2015
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“As mentioned above, increased tension of the cricothyroid muscle impacts the frequency of vocal fold vibration (Kreiman and Sidtis, 2011; Zhang, 2015) whereas increased subglottal pressure has an impact on the vocal loudness (Herbst et al., 2015; Zhang, 2015; Yao et al., 2016; Sundberg, 2017).”
From Voice Stress Analysis: A New Framework for Voice and Effort in Human Performance (2018) · cites this paper as Zhang, 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Synthesis of Voiced Sounds From a Two-Mass Model of the Vocal Cords
Ishizaka, K., & Flanagan, J. L. (1972) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1972.tb02651.x · Cited by 904
Holmberg, E. B., Hillman, R. E., & Perkell, J. S. (1988) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.396829 · Cited by 649
Morphological Structure of the Vocal Cord as a Vibrator and its Variations
Hirano, M. (2009) · Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica · doi:10.1159/000263771 · Cited by 632
Measurement of vocal fold intraglottal pressure and impact stress
Jiang, J. J., & Titze, I. R. (1994) · Journal of Voice · doi:10.1016/s0892-1997(05)80305-4 · Cited by 268
A finite-element model of vocal-fold vibration
Alipour, F., Berry, D. A., & Titze, I. R. (2000) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1324678 · Cited by 268
Scherer, R. C., Shinwari, D., Witt, K. J. D., et al. (2001) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1333420 · Cited by 267
Regulatory Mechanism of Voice Intensity Variation
Isshiki, N. (1964) · Journal of Speech and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/jshr.0701.17 · Cited by 267
Berry, D. A., Herzel, H., Titze, I. R., & Krischer, K. (1994) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.409875 · Cited by 227
A theoretical study of the effects of various laryngeal configurations on the acoustics of phonation
Titze, I. R., & Talkin, D. T. (1979) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.382973 · Cited by 207
Parameterization of the glottal area, glottal flow, and vocal fold contact area
Titze, I. R. (1984) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.390530 · Cited by 200
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 1981, Clinical Examination of Voice: Disorders of Human Communication
- 1994, Principles of Voice Production
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Voice Stress Analysis: A New Framework for Voice and Effort in Human Performance
Van Puyvelde, M., Neyt, X., McGlone, F., & Pattyn, N. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01994 · Cited by 129
“As mentioned above, increased tension of the cricothyroid muscle impacts the frequency of vocal fold vibration (Kreiman and Sidtis, 2011; Zhang, 2015) whereas increased subglottal pressure has an impact on the vocal loudness (Herbst et al., 2015; Zhang, 2015; Yao et al., 2016; Sundberg, 2017).”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Z.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Zhaoyan
- ORCID
- Zhang, Zhaoyan
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 2015-02-01
- Volume
- 137
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 898-910
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- PMC
- PMC4336262
- OpenAlex
- W2042521756
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 3.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC009229, R01DC011299)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Voice and Speech Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Music Technology and Sound Studies
- Keywords
- glottal closure, glottal opening, air flow, subglottal pressure, glottal resistance, vocal efficiency, fundamental frequency, phonation
- MeSH terms
- Acoustics, Biomechanical Phenomena, Computer Simulation, Elasticity, Glottis, Humans, Models, Anatomic, Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted, Phonation, Pressure, Rheology, Vibration, Voice Quality, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
