CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 62Voice and Speech DisordersPhonetics and Phonology ResearchMusic Technology and Sound Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Regulation of glottal closure and airflow in a three-dimensional phonation model: implications for vocal intensity control.

Open access
Zhang, Zhaoyan·2015·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
DOI 10.1121/1.4906272PMC PMC4336262
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Maintaining a small glottal opening across a large range of voice conditions is critical to normal voice production. This study investigated the effectiveness of vocal fold approximation and stiffening in regulating glottal opening and airflow during phonation, using a three-dimensional numerical model of phonation. The results showed that with increasing subglottal pressure the vocal folds were gradually pushed open, leading to increased mean glottal opening and flow rate. A small glottal opening and a mean glottal flow rate typical of human phonation can be maintained against increasing subglottal pressure by proportionally increasing the degree of vocal fold approximation for low to medium subglottal pressures and vocal fold stiffening at high subglottal pressures. Although sound intensity was primarily determined by the subglottal pressure, the results suggest that, to maintain small glottal opening as the sound intensity increases, one has to simultaneously tighten vocal fold approximation and/or stiffen the vocal folds, resulting in increased glottal resistance, vocal efficiency, and fundamental frequency.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1121/1.4906272

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 1981, Clinical Examination of Voice: Disorders of Human Communication
  2. 1994, Principles of Voice Production

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 62

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, Z.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Zhaoyan
ORCID
Zhang, Zhaoyan
Venue
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Publisher
Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
Published
2015-02-01
Volume
137
Issue
2
Pages
898-910
ISSN
  • 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-8524
DOI
10.1121/1.4906272
PMC
PMC4336262
OpenAlex
W2042521756
Cited by
62
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC009229, R01DC011299)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Music Technology and Sound Studies
Keywords
glottal closure, glottal opening, air flow, subglottal pressure, glottal resistance, vocal efficiency, fundamental frequency, phonation
MeSH terms
Acoustics, Biomechanical Phenomena, Computer Simulation, Elasticity, Glottis, Humans, Models, Anatomic, Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted, Phonation, Pressure, Rheology, Vibration, Voice Quality, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review