Cited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

What the f***: An acoustic-pragmatic analysis of meaning in The Wire

Gold, Erica, McIntyre, Dan·2016·Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Abstract

The award-winning television drama, The Wire, contains a famous scene in which Detectives Moreland and McNulty discuss the crime scene they are investigating using only variations of a single expletive—fuck. Despite limited vocabulary, viewers are able to extract meaning and interpret the scene. This study considers all of the expletives produced in the scene, and carries out an acoustic analysis of / ʌ /—F1~F3 (midpoint and averages) and vowel duration. These measurements are then used in combination with Gricean (Grice 1975) and neo-Gricean (e.g. Horn 1984) pragmatic analysis in an attempt to categorize the intended meaning of fuck as: intensification, confusion, dissatisfaction or suspicion (Fairman 2009). Vowel measurements are considered for Moreland and McNulty individually, and vowel normalization is carried out in order to determine pragmatic categorizations across both detectives. This paper argues that acoustic-phonetic analysis can augment Gricean and neo-Gricean pragmatic analysis by providing a means of determining whether what appears at a lexical level to be conversationally implicated meaning is in fact conventional implicature conveyed at the phonetic level.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1121/1.4970203

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gold, E., & McIntyre, D.
Affiliations
Dept. of Linguist and Modern Lang., Univ. of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, United Kingdom, e.gold@hud.ac.uk
Venue
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2016-10-01
Volume
140
Issue
4_Supplement
Pages
3228-3228
ISSN
  • 0001-4966
  • 1520-8524
Cited by
1
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review