Explainable artificial intelligence: Linking domain knowledge and machine interpretation using cognitive sampling of acoustical datasets
Abstract
Explainable artificial intelligence is gaining wider traction within the machine learning community and its application domains at large for its inherent motivation to explain and interpret large-scale machine interpretation of experimental datasets. We will present cognitive sampling as new way to implement explainable AI for acoustical signal processing. In particular, methods based on geometric signal processing and sparse sensing will be harnessed with machine cognition to interpret, classify and predict information autonomously from large-scale acoustic datasets spanning a wide variety of applications. We will compare the difference in performance between traditional supervised and semi-supervised learning architectures such as deep learning, and ensemble approaches, unsupervised learning networks. We will also present preliminary research on implementing cognitive sampling in machine-directed inverse problem-solving techniques such as autoencoders. The end goal is to discover efficient data encodings that enable hitherto unforeseen feature spaces using optimal or close to optimal sampling strategies. Specific applications will include a variety of acoustical environmental sensing applications involving spectral feature generation and interpretation such as sonar signal processing, undersea multipath channel sensing, as well as feature extraction in complex melodic structures in Indian classical music. [Work funded partially by ONR under Grants N00014-19-1-2436, N00014-19-1-2609, N00174-20-1-0016 and N00014-20-1-2626.]
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Explainable AI methods-from layer-wise relevance propagation and SHAP analyses to Bayesian deep learning-are beginning to open the black box, revealing which spectral cues models actually use and how confident they are.
“Explainable AI (XAI) methods—from layer-wise relevance propagation and SHAP analyses to Bayesian deep learning are beginning to open the black box, revealing which spectral cues models actually use and how confident they are”
From Listening forward: emerging roles of bioacoustics in ecology, evolution, and conservation (2026) · cites this paper as Gupta et al. 2021
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Listening forward: emerging roles of bioacoustics in ecology, evolution, and conservation
Zsebők, S. (2026) · Biologia Futura · doi:10.1007/s42977-026-00322-5
“…archiving, and querying of large acoustic datasets (Aide et al. 2013; K. F. Darras et al. 2024; Martínez Balvanera et al. 2025 (Becker et al. 2018; Gupta et al. 2021); autoencoder-based clustering of vocalizations (Bergler et al. 2019); hierarchical Dirichlet process HMMs for acoustic unit…”
- Authors
- Gupta, A. S., Kubicek, B., McCarthy, R. A., Linhardt, T., Hermann, L., & Kemerling, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gupta, Ananya Sen
- Venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Publisher
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Published
- 2021-04-01
- Volume
- 149
- Issue
- 4_Supplement
- Pages
- A36-A37
- ISSN
- 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8524
- OpenAlex
- W3173077534
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Keywords
- explainable AI, sparse sensing, machine cognition, semi-supervised learning, autoencoder, inverse problems, sonar signal processing, Indian classical music, spectral feature extraction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review