The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Monitoring Athlete Training Loads: Consensus Statement
Open accessAbstract
Monitoring the load placed on athletes in both training and competition has become a very hot topic in sport science. Both scientists and coaches routinely monitor training loads using multidisciplinary approaches, and the pursuit of the best methodologies to capture and interpret data has produced an exponential increase in empirical and applied research. Indeed, the field has developed with such speed in recent years that it has given rise to industries aimed at developing new and novel paradigms to allow us to precisely quantify the internal and external loads placed on athletes and to help protect them from injury and ill health. In February 2016, a conference on “Monitoring Athlete Training Loads—The Hows and the Whys” was convened in Doha, Qatar, which brought together experts from around the world to share their applied research and contemporary practices in this rapidly growing field and also to investigate where it may branch to in the future. This consensus statement brings together the key findings and recommendations from this conference in a shared conceptual framework for use by coaches, sport-science and -medicine staff, and other related professionals who have an interest in monitoring athlete training loads and serves to provide an outline on what athlete-load monitoring is and how it is being applied in research and practice, why load monitoring is important and what the underlying rationale and prospective goals of monitoring are, and where athlete-load monitoring is heading in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dose-Response Matters! - A Perspective on the Exercise Prescription in Exercise-Cognition Research
Herold, F., Müller, P., Gronwald, T., & Müller, N. G. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02338 · Cited by 196
Gastin, P. B., Hunkin, S. L., Fahrner, B., & Robertson, S. (2019) · Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/jsc.0000000000003023 · Cited by 82
Self-citationBozzini, B. N., McFadden, B. A., Scruggs, S. K., & Arent, S. M. (2021) · Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/jsc.0000000000004051 · Cited by 11
Workload Monitoring in Team Sports: Using Elite Cricket as an Example
Christie, C. J., Barnard, D. V., Pote, L., & Munro, C. E. (2020) · Indian Journal of Orthopaedics · doi:10.1007/s43465-020-00085-8 · Cited by 10
Strength and conditioning for cricket fielding: A narrative review
Lim, J., Wong, S., McErlain-Naylor, S. A., Scanlan, A., Goggins, L., Ahmun, R., Comfort, P., & Weldon, A. (2023) · Strength & Conditioning Journal · doi:10.1519/ssc.0000000000000758 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Bourdon, P. C., Cardinale, M., Murray, A., Gastin, P., Kellmann, M., Varley, M. C., Gabbett, T. J., Coutts, A. J., Burgess, D. J., Gregson, W., & Cable, N. T.
- Venue
- International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
- Publisher
- Human Kinetics
- Published
- 2017-04
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- s2
- Pages
- S2-161-S2-170
- ISSN
- 1555-0265 (ISSN-L)
- 1555-0273
- OpenAlex
- W2610814033
- Cited by
- 1,206
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 79.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.