Cited by 6Muscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Performance Effects of Carbohydrate Ingestion Between Bouts of Intense Aerobic Interval Exercise

McCarthy, Devin G., Spriet, Lawrence L.·2020·International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

Abstract

Background: Rest between training sessions can be short for athletes. In these situations, consuming carbohydrate (CHO) postexercise replenishes glycogen stores, which is important for recovery and subsequent performance. Purpose: This study tested whether CHO intake during a 2-hour rest between exercise bouts improved performance in the subsequent bout. Methods: In a randomized, single-blinded, crossover design, 10 recreationally active participants (23 [4] y, 70.8 [6.6] kg, 47.0 [5.4] mL·O 2·min−1·kg·body·mass−1) arrived at the lab postprandial and completed 2 exercise bouts separated by a 2-hour rest. Bouts included 5 × 4-minute intervals at ∼80% peak oxygen consumption separated by 2 minutes at ∼40% peak oxygen consumption and ended with an endurance trial to voluntary exhaustion at ∼90% peak oxygen consumption. During intervals 1 and 4 in each bout, expired gases were collected and O 2 deficit was estimated. Immediately following bout 1, either a CHO (1.2 g CHO·kg·body·mass−1) or placebo solution was consumed. Results: Endurance trial duration decreased in bout 2 versus 1 in both conditions (P < .01) but was ∼35% longer in bout 2 with CHO versus placebo (interaction, P = .03; post hoc, P = .03). Oxygen uptake increased during interval 4 versus 1 in both bouts (P < .01) but was unaffected by CHO (P ≥ .58). O 2 deficit was unaffected by CHO (P = .93), bout, or interval (P ≥ .15). Perceived exertion was higher in bout 2 versus 1 (P < .001) and reduced in intervals 2 and 4 in CHO (P ≤ .01). Conclusions: When rest between training sessions is 2 hours, athletes may improve subsequent performance by consuming CHO during recovery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/ijspp.2019-0239

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 6

Authors
McCarthy, D. G., & Spriet, L. L.
Affiliations
University of Guelph (CA)
Venue
International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
Published
2020-02-01
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
262-267
ISSN
  • 1555-0265 (ISSN-L)
  • 1555-0273
OpenAlex
W2949905515
Cited by
6
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
carbohydrate intake, endurance performance, oxygen consumption, perceived exertion, post-exercise nutrition
MeSH terms
High-Intensity Interval Training, Blood Glucose, Dietary Carbohydrates, Energy Metabolism, Physical Exertion, Glycogen, Humans, Liver Glycogen, Male, Oxygen Consumption, Perception, Physical Endurance, Pulmonary Gas Exchange, Rest, Time Factors, Single-Blind Method, Muscle, Skeletal, Cross-Over Studies, Muscle Fatigue, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review